Identification of Differentially Expressed microRNAs between the Fenpropathrin Resistant and Susceptible Strains in Tetranychus cinnabarinus

被引:11
|
作者
Zhang, Yichao [1 ]
Xu, Zhifeng [1 ]
Wu, Qiong [1 ]
Peng, Miao [1 ]
Liu, Yanchao [1 ]
Liu, Xing [1 ]
Shi, Li [1 ]
Shen, Guangmao [1 ]
Pan, Yu [2 ]
He, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Coll Plant Protect, Key Lab Entomol & Pest Control Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Coll Hort & Landscape Agr, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES; 2-SPOTTED SPIDER-MITE; PYRETHROID RESISTANCE; DEVELOPMENTAL-STAGES; ACARI TETRANYCHIDAE; SODIUM-CHANNEL; DNA-SEQUENCES; CULEX-PIPIENS; GENES; URTICAE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0152924
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The carmine spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus) is one of the most serious pests on crops and its control mainly depends on chemical acaricides. The excessive and improper acaricides use has resulted in mite resistance to many acaricides, including fenpropathrin. Previous studies have indicated fenpropathrin resistance is a complex development process involving many genes, but information on resistance mechanism of post-transcription regulation is rare. Using Illumina sequencing, several categories of sRNAs were identified from susceptible (TS) and fenpropathrin-resistant strains (TR) of T. cinnabarinus, including 75 known microRNAs (miRNAs) and 64 novel miRNAs, whose target genes containing 78592 miRNA-target pairs were predicted by 6 algorithms. Also, 12 significantly differently expressed miRNAs were identified between the TS and TR libraries and RT-qPCR validation also performed a well consistency with sequencing. The targets of significantly differentially expressed miRNAs included 7 glutathione S-transferase, 7 cytochrome P450 and 16 carboxyl/choline esterase genes, their function in fenpropathrin resistance were further analyzed. The present study provides the firstly large-scale characterization of miRNAs in T. cinnabarinus and the comparison between TS and TR strains gives a clue on how miRNA involves in fenpropathrin resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Genetically determined inflammatory-response related cytokine and chemokine transcript profiles between mammary carcinoma resistant and susceptible rat strains
    Devapatla, Bharat
    Sanders, Jennifer
    Samuelson, David J.
    CYTOKINE, 2012, 59 (02) : 223 - 227
  • [22] Identification and analysis of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs between multiparous and uniparous goat (Capra hircus) ovaries
    Ling, Yinghui
    Xu, Lina
    Zhu, Long
    Sui, Menghua
    Zheng, Qi
    Li, Wenyong
    Liu, Yong
    Fang, Fugui
    Zhang, Xiaorong
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [23] Comparative CYP-omic analysis between the DDT-susceptible and -resistant Drosophila melanogaster strains 91-C and 91-R
    Seong, Keon Mook
    Coates, Brad S.
    Berenbaum, May R.
    Clark, John M.
    Pittendrigh, Barry R.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (11) : 2530 - 2543
  • [24] A Comparative Study of Transcriptional Regulation Mechanism of Cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 between Resistant and Susceptible Strains of Helicoverpa armigera
    Huang, Yun
    Zheng, Junyue
    Wu, Peizhuo
    Zhang, Yu
    Qiu, Lihong
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2023, 71 (24) : 9314 - 9323
  • [25] Identification of proteins differentially expressed between capillary endothelial cells of hepatocellular carcinoma and normal liver in an orthotopic rat tumor model using 2-D DIGE
    Jia, Jinghui
    Wang, Jingyu
    Teh, Ming
    Sun, Wei
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Kee, Irene
    Chow, Pierce K. -H.
    Liang, Rosa Cynthia M. -Y.
    Chung, Maxey C. M.
    Ge, Ruowen
    PROTEOMICS, 2010, 10 (02) : 224 - 234
  • [26] DIFFERENCE IN THE PROPERTY OF THE NERVE CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN-KINASE BETWEEN KDR-TYPE, PYRETHROID-RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE STRAINS OF MUSCA-DOMESTICA AND BLATTELLA-GERMANICA
    CHARALAMBOUS, P
    MATSUMURA, F
    INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 22 (07) : 721 - 734