Motivators and barriers to research among doctors in the Indian medical scenario: A cross-sectional study from Karnataka, India

被引:11
作者
Shanmukhappa, Sanjana Chetana [1 ]
Abraham, Rahul R. [1 ]
Venkatesh, Vinyas Shraffi [2 ]
Abraham, Rithika R. [3 ]
机构
[1] AFPI Natl Ctr Primary Care Res & Policy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Kempegowda Inst Med Sci, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[3] Father Muller Med Coll, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
关键词
Barriers; challenges; data falsification; mentorship; motivators; plagiarism; research; PUBLICATION; REJECTION;
D O I
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_369_20
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The fundamental principles of healthcare practices and policies are derived from good quality research. Doctors collectively are a source of vast sums of invaluable information. This information if effectively utilized can improve and strengthen the healthcare system. Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the ecosystem of an Indian medical researcher. Objectives: To understand (1) the obstacles faced by medical professionals (2) the challenges encountered at various steps (3) the gaps in research knowledge and (4) the means to rectify them. Method: Doctors from medical schools, hospitals, and in private practices were approached. Data were collected through online and physical questionnaire. Data were analyzed and studied. Results: The total number of participants in this study is 212. Case reports (51.9%) and case-control studies (51.14%) are the most frequently conducted types of research. Lack of access to research journals (43.9%) and absence of proper guidance or mentorship (37.39%) are the commonly faced challenges among individuals who have pursued research, whereas busy schedule is the top-cited reason for not pursuing research (34.24%) and discontinuing research (57.4%). Coordinating time schedule with mentees is a challenge for mentors (49.2%). Doctors also face the greatest difficulty (48.12%) and delay (47.4%) in the publication process. On the other hand, personal interest (60.15%) and job requirement (46.61%) are the top facilitators for research. A small percentage has or knows someone that has plagiarized (21.32%) or falsified data (33.49%). Most of the doctors agree that research experience should be a mandatory part of undergrad training (81.6%). Conclusion: We believe interest, impact and importance of research can be the best developed and emphasized in the training years. Institutional support, adequate mentorship and an uplifting research environment can go a long way in motivating the doctors and tackling the challenges they face.
引用
收藏
页码:4053 / 4061
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Creating More Effective Mentors: Mentoring the Mentor [J].
Gandhi, Monica ;
Johnson, Mallory .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 20 :S294-S303
[22]   Data collection challenges in community settings: insights from two field studies of patients with chronic disease [J].
Holden, Richard J. ;
Scott, Amanda M. McDougald ;
Hoonakker, Peter L. T. ;
Hundt, Ann S. ;
Carayon, Pascale .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (05) :1043-1055
[23]   Rise of academic plagiarism in India: Reasons, solutions and resolution [J].
Juyal, Deepak ;
Thawani, Vijay ;
Thaledi, Shweta .
LUNG INDIA, 2015, 32 (05) :542-+
[24]   Prevalence, Characteristics, and Publication of Discontinued Randomized Trials [J].
Kasenda, Benjamin ;
von Elm, Erik ;
You, John ;
Bluemle, Anette ;
Tomonaga, Yuki ;
Saccilotto, Ramon ;
Amstutz, Alain ;
Bengough, Theresa ;
Meerpohl, Joerg J. ;
Stegert, Mihaela ;
Tikkinen, Kari A. O. ;
Neumann, Ignacio ;
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso ;
Faulhaber, Markus ;
Mulla, Sohail M. ;
Mertz, Dominik ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Bassler, Dirk ;
Busse, Jason W. ;
Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio ;
Lamontagne, Francois ;
Nordmann, Alain ;
Gloy, Viktoria ;
Raatz, Heike ;
Moja, Lorenzo ;
Rosenthal, Rachel ;
Ebrahim, Shanil ;
Schandelmaier, Stefan ;
Xin, Sun ;
Vandvik, Per O. ;
Johnston, Bradley C. ;
Walter, Martin A. ;
Burnand, Bernard ;
Schwenkglenks, Matthias ;
Hemkens, Lars G. ;
Bucher, Heiner C. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Briel, Matthias .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10) :1045-1051
[25]   Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay [J].
Lotriet, Cornelius J. .
AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 5 (01) :26-29
[26]  
Marusic M., 2003, Arch. Oncol., V11, P59, DOI [10.2298/AOO0302059M, DOI 10.2298/AOO0302059M]
[27]   Creating an Interest in Research and Development as a Means of Reducing the Gap between Theory and Practice in Primary Care: An Interventional Study Based on Strategic Communication [J].
Mortenius, Helena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (09) :8689-8708
[28]  
National Academy of Sciences (US) National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, 1993, RESPONSIBLE SCI ENSU, VII
[29]   Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance [J].
Sahel, Jose-Alain .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (84)
[30]   Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward research: The perspectives of undergraduate medical and dental students [J].
Soe, Htoo Htoo Kyaw ;
Than, Nan Nitra ;
Lwin, Htay ;
Htay, Mila Nu Nu ;
Phyu, Khine Lynn ;
Abas, Adinegara Lutfi .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2018, 7 (01)