Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors

被引:46
作者
Friess, Daniel A. [1 ]
Phelps, Jacob [2 ]
Garmendia, Eneko [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Jalan CIFOR, Sindang Barang 16115, Bogor, Indonesia
[3] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao 48008, Bizkaia, Spain
[4] Ikerbasque, Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao 48008, Spain
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[6] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2015年 / 30卷
关键词
Blue carbon; Ecosystem stability; Permanence; REDD; Regime shift; Transaction costs; INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS; SEA-LEVEL RISE; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CORAL-REEFS; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; MISSISSIPPI DELTA; SOUTH-AFRICA; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic instruments such as Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes are increasingly promoted to protect ecosystems (and their associated ecosystem services) that are threatened by processes of local and global change. Biophysical stressors external to a PES site, such as forest fires, pollution, sea level rise, and ocean acidification, may undermine ecosystem stability and sustained ecosystem service provision, yet their threats and impacts are difficult to account for within PES scheme design. We present a typology of external biophysical stressors, characterizing them in terms of stressor origin, spatial domain and temporal scale. We further analyse how external stressors can potentially impinge on key PES parameters, as they (1) threaten ecosystem service provision, additionality and permanence, (2) add challenges to the identification of PES providers and beneficiaries, and (3) add complexity and costs to PES mechanism design. Effective PES implementation under external stressors requires greater emphasis on the evaluation and mitigation of external stressors, and further instruments that can accommodate associated risks and uncertainties. A greater understanding of external stressors will increase our capacity to design multi-scale instruments to conserve important ecosystems in times of environmental change. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 42
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Could Payments for Ecosystem Services Create an "Ecosystem Service Curse"?
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    Hubacek, Klaus
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [32] Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam's PES program
    Thu-Ha Dang Phan
    Brouwer, Roy
    Long Phi Hoang
    Davidson, Marc David
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [33] The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Salzman, James
    Bennett, Genevieve
    Carroll, Nathaniel
    Goldstein, Allie
    Jenkins, Michael
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (03): : 136 - 144
  • [34] Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view
    Van Hecken, Gert
    Bastiaensen, Johan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (08) : 785 - 792
  • [35] Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Pascual, Unai
    Phelps, Jacob
    Garmendia, Eneko
    Brown, Katrina
    Corbera, Esteve
    Martin, Adrian
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Muradian, Roldan
    BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (11) : 1027 - 1036
  • [36] Payments for environmental and ecosystem services for water production
    Leitao, Alexander Matos
    da Silva, Luciana Ferreira
    NATIVA, 2022, 10 (02): : 269 - 276
  • [37] Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment
    Matthies, Brent D.
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    Valsta, Lauri T.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 1 - 12
  • [38] Farmers' perspectives on payments for ecosystem services in Uganda
    Geussens, K.
    Van den Broeck, G.
    Vanderhaegen, K.
    Verbist, B.
    Maertens, M.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 316 - 327
  • [39] Payments for Ecosystem Services-the Case of Forests
    Prokofieva, Irina
    CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2016, 2 (02): : 130 - 142
  • [40] Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate
    Van Hecken, Gert
    Bastiaensen, Johan
    Windey, Catherine
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 120 : 117 - 125