Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare Quality Improvement: How organizations can help patients and professionals to collaborate

被引:84
作者
Renedo, Alicia [1 ]
Marston, Cicely Alice [1 ]
Spyridonidis, Dimitrios [2 ]
Barlow, James [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Social & Environm Hlth Res, London WC1, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Imperial Coll Business Sch, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
organizational culture; quality improvement; community participation; Patient and public involvement (PPI); healthcare; USER INVOLVEMENT; PARTICIPATION; REPRESENTATIVENESS; OPPORTUNITIES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2014.881535
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Citizens across the world are increasingly called upon to participate in healthcare improvement. It is often unclear how this can be made to work in practice. This 4-year ethnography of a UK healthcare improvement initiative showed that patients used elements of organizational culture as resources to help them collaborate with healthcare professionals. The four elements were: (1) organizational emphasis on non-hierarchical, multidisciplinary collaboration; (2) organizational staff ability to model desired behaviours of recognition and respect; (3) commitment to rapid action, including quick translation of research into practice; and (4) the constant data collection and reflection process facilitated by improvement methods.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 34
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Abelson J., 2010, Effective strategies for interactive public engagement in the development of healthcare policies and programs
  • [2] Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: Results from a Canadian comparative study
    Abelson, Julia
    Forest, Pierre-Gerlier
    Eyles, John
    Casebeer, Ann
    Martin, Elisabeth
    Mackean, Gail
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (10) : 2115 - 2128
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, WRITING ETHNOGRAPHIC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, SOCIAL POLICY REV
  • [7] Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement
    Armstrong, Natalie
    Herbert, Georgia
    Aveling, Emma-Louise
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Martin, Graham
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2013, 16 (03) : E36 - E47
  • [8] Attride-Stirling J, 2001, Qual Res, V1, P385, DOI [10.1177/146879410100100307, DOI 10.1177/146879410100100307]
  • [9] User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions
    Beresford, Peter
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2007, 15 (04) : 306 - 312
  • [10] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352