Role of Codification and Personalization in Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions

被引:0
作者
Lo, Man Fung [1 ]
Ng, Peggy Mei Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Profess Educ & Execut Dev, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2015) | 2015年
关键词
codification; personalization; organizational learning; innovation; knowledge management; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY; BALANCED SCORECARD; FIRMS; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; CAPABILITY; LINKING; IMPACT; MODEL; VIEW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper first provides a literature review that summarizes the inter-relationships among knowledge management (KM), organizational learning (OL), organization innovation (INNO) and organizational performance (OP) and a conceptual framework is then proposed to improve the OP through appropriate KM strategies. Two widely-adopted KM strategies -codification and personalization-are examined. Codification is defined as the extraction and storage of explicit knowledge from employees while personalization refers to the activities, like communities-of-practice or storytelling, which facilitate the knowledge transfer and exchange in organizations. Several studies emphasize that organizations should adopt one of them predominantly, in a ratio of 80 to 20 - i.e. 80% for personalization while 20% for codification or vice versa. In contrast, some researchers advocate that organizations should strike a balance between two strategies. The prioritization or balance between codification and personalization remains questionable. Moreover, KM strategies are proven to influence the OP directly and indirectly through INNO in many studies. In addition, one recent study points out that OL plays the mediator role between KM and INNO. However, there have been limited studies to address the relationship between codification/personalization and OL. Further investigation is needed. To develop the conceptual framework in this paper, diverse literature on codification, personalization, OL, INNO and OP were reviewed. As mentioned, the key elements in KM strategies are codification and personalization. Commitment to learning, open-mindedness and experimentation and shared vision are the major components of OL. INNO is further classified into four sub-categories: administrative, technical, product and process innovation. OP is measured in financial performance, customer intimacy, learning and growth and internal operation. This proposed framework seeks to enhance the understanding of different processes mediating KM strategies and OP. Understanding the roles of OL and INNO, senior management can gain the insights in prioritizing/balancing between different KM strategies and in turn improving OP.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 150
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Knowledge management strategies, innovation, and organisational performance An empirical study of the Iraqi MTS [J].
Al-Hakim, Laith Ali Yousif ;
Hassan, Shahizan .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2013, 10 (01) :58-71
[2]   Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test [J].
Alegre, Joaquin ;
Chiva, Ricardo .
TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (06) :315-326
[3]   Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Innovation Performance [J].
Alegre, Joaquin ;
Chiva, Ricardo .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 51 (04) :491-507
[4]   Managing knowledge in international consulting firms [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 13 (06) :491-508
[5]   Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks [J].
Ar, Ilker Murat ;
Baki, Birdogan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 14 (02) :172-+
[6]   Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Miron-Spektor, Ella .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1123-1137
[7]   Organizational learning research: Past, present and future [J].
Argote, Linda .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2011, 42 (04) :439-446
[8]   Can organizational learning foster customer relationships? Implications for performance [J].
Battor, Moustafa ;
Battour, Mohamed .
LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2013, 20 (4-5) :279-+
[9]   Better knowledge with social media? Exploring the roles of social capital and organizational knowledge management [J].
Bharati, Pratyush ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Chaudhury, Abhijit .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (03) :456-475
[10]   The role of codified sources of knowledge in innovation: Empirical evidence from Dutch manufacturing [J].
Brusoni, S ;
Marsili, O ;
Salter, A .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2005, 15 (02) :211-231