Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect efficiency? A case study of farm households in northern Nigeria

被引:23
作者
Berkhout, Ezra D. [1 ]
Schipper, Robert A. [1 ]
Kuyvenhoven, Arie [1 ]
Coulibaly, Ousmane [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Dev Econ Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Int Inst Trop Agr, Cotonou, Benin
关键词
D13; Q12; Heterogeneous behavior; Efficiency analysis; Smallholder agriculture; Nigeria; DECISION-MAKING; ATTITUDES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; OBJECTIVES; DISTRICT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00449.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Household characteristics are commonly used to explain variation in smallholder efficiency levels. The underlying assumption is that differences in intended behavior are well described by such variables, while there is no a priori reason that this is the case. Moreover, heterogeneity in farmer goals and preferences, in relation to the role of the farm enterprise, are not well documented in developing countries. This article makes a contribution to fill this gap, by empirically determining heterogeneity in farmer goals and attitudes in Nigeria through a pair-wise ranking, supplemented with Likert scales. Factor analysis is used to reduce these data into behavioral factors. We estimate technical and allocative efficiency levels and analyze how these are related to farm characteristics and the identified behavioral factors. The models in which both intended behavior and farmer characteristics are included give a significantly better fit over models in which only household characteristics are included. These regression results suggest that the socioeconomic environment affects efficiency levels both directly and indirectly, through changes in goals and attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Ray S., 2004, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANA
[22]   Smallholder technical efficiency controlling for environmental production conditions [J].
Sherlund, SM ;
Barrett, CB ;
Adesina, AA .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2002, 69 (01) :85-101
[23]   Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes [J].
Simar, Leopold ;
Wilson, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 136 (01) :31-64
[24]  
Singh I., 1986, Agricultural household models. Extensions, applications, and policy, P17
[25]   Using farmer decision-making profiles and managerial capacity as predictors of farm management and performance in Costa Rican dairy farms [J].
Solano, C ;
León, H ;
Pérez, E ;
Tole, L ;
Fawcett, RH ;
Herrero, M .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 88 (2-3) :395-428
[26]  
Stock James H, 2015, Introduction to econometrics
[27]   Analysing trade-offs in resource and labour allocation by smallholder farmers using inverse modelling techniques: A case-study from Kakamega district, western Kenya [J].
Tittonell, P. ;
van Wijk, M. T. ;
Rufino, M. C. ;
Vrugt, J. A. ;
Giller, K. E. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 95 (1-3) :76-95
[28]  
Van Kooten G.C., 1986, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, V11, P40
[29]   Farmers' attitudes, objectives, behaviors, and personality traits: The Edinburgh Study of Decision Making on Farms [J].
Willock, J ;
Deary, IJ ;
McGregor, MM ;
Sutherland, A ;
Edwards-Jones, G ;
Morgan, O ;
Dent, B ;
Grieve, R ;
Gibson, G ;
Austin, E .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 54 (01) :5-36