Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect efficiency? A case study of farm households in northern Nigeria

被引:24
作者
Berkhout, Ezra D. [1 ]
Schipper, Robert A. [1 ]
Kuyvenhoven, Arie [1 ]
Coulibaly, Ousmane [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Dev Econ Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Int Inst Trop Agr, Cotonou, Benin
关键词
D13; Q12; Heterogeneous behavior; Efficiency analysis; Smallholder agriculture; Nigeria; DECISION-MAKING; ATTITUDES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; OBJECTIVES; DISTRICT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00449.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Household characteristics are commonly used to explain variation in smallholder efficiency levels. The underlying assumption is that differences in intended behavior are well described by such variables, while there is no a priori reason that this is the case. Moreover, heterogeneity in farmer goals and preferences, in relation to the role of the farm enterprise, are not well documented in developing countries. This article makes a contribution to fill this gap, by empirically determining heterogeneity in farmer goals and attitudes in Nigeria through a pair-wise ranking, supplemented with Likert scales. Factor analysis is used to reduce these data into behavioral factors. We estimate technical and allocative efficiency levels and analyze how these are related to farm characteristics and the identified behavioral factors. The models in which both intended behavior and farmer characteristics are included give a significantly better fit over models in which only household characteristics are included. These regression results suggest that the socioeconomic environment affects efficiency levels both directly and indirectly, through changes in goals and attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Aubyn, Miguel St. .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2006, 23 (03) :476-491
[2]   The production efficiency of intercropping annual and perennial crops in southern Ethiopia: A comparison of distance functions and production frontiers [J].
Alene, Arega D. ;
Manyong, Victor M. ;
Gockowski, James .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 91 (1-2) :51-70
[3]   Farmer-to-farmer technology diffusion and yield variation among adopters: the case of improved cowpea in northern Nigeria [J].
Alene, Arega D. ;
Manyong, V. M. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 35 (02) :203-211
[4]   Multidimensional goals of beef and dairy producers: an inter-industry comparison [J].
Basarir, Aydin ;
Gillespie, Jeffrey M. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 35 (01) :103-114
[5]   Entrepreneurial behaviour of Dutch dairy farmers under a milk quota system: goals, objectives and attitudes [J].
Bergevoet, RHM ;
Ondersteijn, CJM ;
Saatkamp, HW ;
van Woerkum, CMJ ;
Huirne, RBM .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 80 (01) :1-21
[6]  
Berkhout E.D., 2009, THESIS WAGENINGEN U
[7]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - EXPERIMENTAL-MEASUREMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1980, 62 (03) :395-407
[8]   Personal preferences and intensification of land use: their impact on southern Cameroonian slash-and-burn agroforestry systems [J].
Brown, Douglas R. .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2006, 68 (01) :53-67
[9]  
Cameron A. C., 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
[10]   Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world [J].
Cardenas, Juan Camilo ;
Carpenter, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2008, 44 (03) :311-338