Sliding corner gusset connections for improved buckling-restrained braced steel frame seismic performance: Subassemblage tests

被引:27
作者
Zhao, Junxian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ruobing [2 ]
Wang, Zhan [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Yi [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Subtrop Bldg Sci, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Transportat, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Buckling-restrained brace; Gusset connection; Braced frame; Frame action; Seismic performance; STABILITY DESIGN METHOD; THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS; PINNED CONNECTIONS; CYCLIC BEHAVIOR; END CONNECTION; LARGE-SCALE; COLLARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.031
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Although brace-type hysteretic dampers have been widely adopted to mitigate structural damage under severe earthquakes, their performance was often limited by premature rupture of the welded corner gusset connection or its surrounding framing members due to additional frame action. Such a frame-gusset interaction was found more detrimental for buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). A sliding corner gusset connection, which is connected to beam and column flanges by bolted end plates, but allows sliding deformations at the frame-gusset interfaces via employment of butyl rubber layers, is proposed to minimize such an interaction. Cyclic tests of three steel BRBF subassemblages, two with the proposed sliding configuration and another with the traditional welded one, were conducted to verify effectiveness of the proposed connection. Test results show that significant plastic damages were observed on the welded gusset connection and its surrounding beam. Seismic performance of this specimen was limited by significant out-of-plane and local buckling of the beam prior to brace rupture. Such an undesirable failure could be avoided by the proposed connection, in which the specimen with beam flange reinforcing plates exhibited satisfactory performance up to 4% drift, followed by additional 3% drift with 11 more cycles until brace rupture. The proposed connection is effective in reducing the seismic shear and flexural responses on the framing members, as well as the stress responses at the gusset interfaces. Structural behavior of the two types of gusset connection is compared and future research needs for design of these connections are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 662
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Aiken I. D., 2002, P JAP PASS CONTR S T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 500172003 GB CHIN BU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 992015 JGJ CHIN BUIL
[4]   Cyclic Testing of a Buckling Restrained Braced Frame with Unconstrained Gusset Connections [J].
Berman, Jeffrey W. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (12) :1499-1510
[5]   Effect of the unbonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained braces [J].
Chen, Quan ;
Wang, Chun-Lin ;
Meng, Shaoping ;
Zeng, Bin .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 111 :478-493
[6]   Steel buckling-restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Liu, Jia-Hau ;
Pham, Dinh-Hai .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (07) :1137-1156
[7]   Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame [J].
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Ricles, James M. ;
Sause, Richard .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (09) :1205-1214
[8]   Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper [J].
Iwata, Mamoru ;
Murai, Masatoshi .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (14) :1807-1826
[9]   Experimental research and cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained braced composite frame [J].
Jia, Mingming ;
Lu, Dagang ;
Guo, Lanhui ;
Sun, Lin .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2014, 95 :90-105
[10]  
Kaneko K., 2008, P 14 WORLD C EARTHQ