Sensitivity of three inmunocromathographic tests in faeces samples for Campylobacter and Salmonella detection in comparison to culture

被引:0
作者
Liebana-Martos, Ma del Carmen [1 ]
Gutierrez, Jose [1 ]
Riazzo, Cristina [1 ]
Navarro, Jose Ma [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Microbiol Serv, E-18014 Granada, Spain
关键词
rapid test; sensibility; feces; enteropathogen; diagnostic; JEJUNI; ASSAY; COLI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction. Campylobacter sp. and Salmonella enterica are two of the main organisms causing gastroenteritis in our environment. Immunochromatographic tests for antigen detection performed directly on stool samples for its simplicity and rapid results may make them useful diagnostic elements in the context of primary care. Method. During October 2012 we selected all feces in which enteropathogenic bacteria are isolated from those received for stool culture in the laboratory of Microbiology of the University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves of Granada. After standard management of faeces samples and isolation of any enteropathogen, the commercial kits: Campy Leti, Ridaquick Campylobacterscreen and Salmonella Leti were tested for simultaneous research of Campylobacter and Salmonella antigens. Sensitivity and specificity were determined. Results. Two hundred and thirty five stool samples were received in which 8 Salmonella enterica (7 B serogroup and 1 D serogroup), 7 Campylobacter jejuni, 4 Aeromonas hydrophila and 1 Yersinia enterocolitica were isolated. Campy Leti, Ridaquick Campylobacterscreen and Salmonella Leti presented a sensitivity of 100%, 100% and 75%, respectively. Specificities corresponded to 46%, 69% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion. Immunocromatographic tests can be useful for a first screening of enteropathogen in primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 105
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Adedayo O., 2008, HOSP PHYS, V44, P9
  • [2] Alvarez M, 2008, PROCEDIMIENTOS MICRO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL
  • [4] Bascuñana P, 2011, REV ESP QUIM, V24, P213
  • [5] New Methods for Detection of Campylobacters in Stool Samples in Comparison to Culture
    Bessede, Emilie
    Delcamp, Adline
    Sifre, Elodie
    Buissonniere, Alice
    Megraud, Francis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (03) : 941 - 944
  • [6] Comparison of Premier CAMPY Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA), ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA, and ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY Tests with Culture for Laboratory Diagnosis of Campylobacter Enteric Infections
    Granato, Paul A.
    Chen, Li
    Holiday, Iris
    Rawling, Russell A.
    Novak-Weekley, Susan M.
    Quinlan, Tammy
    Musser, Kimberlee A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (11) : 4022 - 4027
  • [7] González-Abad MJ, 2013, REV ESP QUIM, V26, P92
  • [8] Development and evaluation of immunochromatographic assay for simple and rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in human stool specimens
    Kawatsu, Kentaro
    Kumeda, Yuko
    Taguchi, Masurni
    Yamazaki-Matsune, Wataru
    Kanki, Masashi
    Inoue, Kiyoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (04) : 1226 - 1231
  • [9] Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay-based stool antigen test to detect Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli
    Tissari, Paivi
    Rautelin, Hilpi
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2007, 58 (02) : 171 - 175
  • [10] Evaluation of the Alexon-Trend ProSpecT Campylobacter microplate assay
    Tolcin, R
    LaSalvia, MM
    Kirkley, BA
    Vetter, EA
    Cockerill, FR
    Procop, GW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (10) : 3853 - 3855