Living donor kidney transplantation:: The effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes

被引:103
作者
Oien, Cecilia Montgomery
Reisaeter, Anna Varberg
Leivestad, Torbjorn
Dekker, Friedo W.
Line, Pal Dag
Os, Ingrid
机构
[1] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Natl Hosp Norway, RadiumHosp Med Ctr, Clin Nephrol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Natl Hosp Norway, RadiumHosp Med Ctr, Inst Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Leiden Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, ERA EDTA Registry, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Natl Hosp Norway, Radiumhosp Med Ctr, Clin Transplant Surg, Oslo, Norway
关键词
kidney transplantation; donor sex; donor age; graft survival; acute rejection episode;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000255583.34329.dd
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The influence of donor age and sex on acute rejection episodes and short- and long-term graft survival in living donor (LD) kidney transplantation has not been well characterized. Methods. This prospective cohort study includes 739 first time LD transplantations with median follow-up time of 55.1 months. Death censored graft survival according to donor age and sex was compared with Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox regression was performed to estimate the association between different risk factors and graft survival and acute rejection episodes. Results. Graft survival was not affected by donor age above 50 years as long as these recipients did not experience an early acute rejection episode. Acute rejection episodes increased in recipients of grafts from donors >= 65 years (P=0.009). Donor age >= 65, recipient age less than 50 years, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR matching, and female donor gender were risk factors for early acute rejection episodes. In multivariate analysis donor age >= 65 years was a risk factor for graft loss in all time periods after transplantation. During the first 5 years after transplantation a steroid resistant rejection episode was an additional risk factor. More than 5 years after transplantation male donor gender was the only additional risk factor for graft loss. Conclusion. These results support the continued use of older male and female living donors who meet carefully constructed medical criteria and who are highly motivated to donate. Furthermore, donor age seems to be a more important predictor of graft loss than donor sex.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 606
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
De Fijter JW, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P1538, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V1271538
[2]   Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR [J].
de la Vega, LSP ;
Torres, A ;
Bohorquez, HE ;
Heimbach, JK ;
Gloor, JM ;
Schwab, TR ;
Taler, SJ ;
Nyberg, SL ;
Ishitani, MB ;
Prieto, M ;
Velosa, JA ;
Larson, TS ;
Stegall, MD ;
Cosio, FG ;
Textor, SC ;
Griffin, MD .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 66 (04) :1654-1661
[3]  
FAUCHALD P, 1991, TRANSPLANT INT, V4, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1991.tb01945.x
[4]  
Halloran PF, 1999, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V10, P167
[5]   Effect of fluvastatin on cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients:: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Holdaas, H ;
Fellström, B ;
Jardine, AG ;
Holme, I ;
Nyberg, G ;
Fauchald, P ;
Grönhagen-Riska, C ;
Madsen, S ;
Neumayer, HH ;
Cole, E ;
Maes, B ;
Ambühl, P ;
Olsson, AG ;
Hartmann, A ;
Solbu, DO ;
Pedersen, TR .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9374) :2024-2031
[6]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF INTERACTION [J].
HOSMER, DW ;
LEMESHOW, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 3 (05) :452-456
[7]  
Kasiske BL, 2002, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V13, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V1341067
[8]  
Kassiske BL, 2001, CLIN TRANSPLANT 2000, P135
[9]   Living donors >55 years -: To use or not to use? [J].
Kerr, SR ;
Gillingham, KJ ;
Johnson, EM ;
Matas, AJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) :999-1004
[10]   Age and immune response in organ transplantation [J].
Martins, PNA ;
Pratschke, J ;
Pascher, A ;
Fritsche, L ;
Frei, U ;
Neuhaus, P ;
Tullius, SG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (02) :127-132