Modeling of Horizontal Water Redistribution in an Unsaturated Soil

被引:9
作者
Zhuang, Luwen [1 ]
Hassanizadeh, S. Majid [1 ,2 ]
van Genuchten, Martinus Th. [1 ,3 ]
Leijnse, Anton [1 ,4 ]
Raoof, Amir
Qin, Chaozhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Earth Sci, Budapestlaan 4, NL-3584 CD Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Soil & Groundwater Syst, Deltares, Netherlands
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dep Mech Engn, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Wageningen Univ, Dept Soil Phys & Land Management, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
PRESSURE-SATURATION RELATIONSHIP; CAPILLARY-PRESSURE; INTERFACIAL AREA; POROUS-MEDIA; 2-PHASE FLOW; HYSTERESIS MODELS; MULTIPHASE FLOW; INFILTRATION; DRAINAGE; CURVES;
D O I
10.2136/vzj2015.08.0109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When two soil samples with the same hydraulic properties but different initial water saturations are brought into contact, water will redistribute horizontally between the samples until some equilibrium is reached. The part with a higher initial saturation undergoes drainage while imbibition occurs in the other part. Hysteresis will not allow water to redistribute evenly between the two parts. In this study we used two different modeling approaches to analyze a recent experiment related to the water redistribution process. In one approach, we assumed applicability of the standard Richards equation with a hysteretic capillary pressure-saturation relationship (including scanning curves). This approach assumes continuity in the water pressure and flux across the contact surface between the two sides. In the second approach, we used an extended two-phase flow formulation based on rational thermodynamics principles and involving the air-water specific interfacial area. For this approach, we used continuity in the Gibbs free energy for air-water interfaces and the interfacial area flux as additional conditions at the contact surface. We employed two different initial conditions: uniform initial saturation for each side and slightly nonuniform initial saturation distributions consistent with the measured water contents. We compared results of both models with measurements. The Richards equation with full hysteresis could not reproduce the measured saturation distribution unless an unrealistic value of the imbibition retention curve was assigned. The interfacial area model compared well with the experimental data after optimization of some of the model parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COMSOL MULT 4 4
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADV INFILTRATION
[3]   REDISTRIBUTION OF SOIL WATER AFTER INFILTRATION [J].
BISWAS, TD ;
NIELSEN, DR ;
BIGGAR, JW .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1966, 2 (03) :513-+
[4]   Measurement of interfacial area per volume for drainage and imbibition [J].
Chen, Daiquan ;
Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. ;
Griffin, Jessica ;
Giordano, Nicholas J. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (12)
[5]   Measurement of air-water interfacial area for multiple hysteretic drainage curves in an unsaturated fine sand [J].
Chen, Lixia ;
Kibbey, Tohren C. G. .
LANGMUIR, 2006, 22 (16) :6874-6880
[6]  
Clark V. L., 1911, ANN REPORT, V25, P246
[7]  
DANE JH, 1975, J HYDROL, V25, P229, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(75)90023-2
[8]   A GENERAL APPROACH TO HYSTERESIS .3. A FORMAL TREATMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT DOMAIN MODEL OF HYSTERESIS [J].
EVERETT, DH .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE FARADAY SOCIETY, 1954, 50 (10) :1077-1096
[9]  
Feuring T., 2010, THESIS STUTTGART U G
[10]   Horizontal Redistribution of Two Fluid Phases in a Porous Medium: Experimental Investigations [J].
Feuring, Tim ;
Braun, Juergen ;
Linders, Barend ;
Bisch, Gerhard ;
Hassanizadeh, S. Majid ;
Niessner, Jennifer .
TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2014, 105 (03) :503-515