Latin America's competitive position in knowledge-intensive services trade

被引:0
作者
Lopez, Andres
Niembro, Andres [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Daniela
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Rio Negro, Interdisciplinary Terr Econ & Societal Res Ctr CI, Rio Negro, Argentina
[2] Natl Council Sci & Technol Res CONICET, Rio Negro, Argentina
来源
CEPAL REVIEW | 2014年 / 113期
关键词
Competitiveness; services trade; knowledge-based economy; international trade; exports; trade statistics; Latin America;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study presents a dynamic analysis of Latin America's competitiveness in trade in knowledge-intensive services. The methodology used to undertake this analysis is based on the TradeCAN approach developed by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), which provides a means of assessing different countries' competitiveness by looking at their exports to the fastest-growing markets. (In the past, it has usually been applied primarily to exports of goods.) The results suggest that, although some Latin American countries have made inroads in knowledge-intensive service segments and have comparative advantages in them, the percentage of "rising stars" (dynamic sectors in which a country or region is gaining in market share) is still low, while there is a high percentage of "missed opportunities" (dynamic sectors in which a country or region is losing market share). This points up the existence of areas in which the region's competitive position is weak and in which policies are needed to leverage its competitive advantages and remove the obstacles that are holding it back from establishing a more advantageous position in knowledge-intensive service markets.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 39
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 5262 WORLD BANK
[2]  
[Anonymous], EXPORTACION SERVICIO
[3]  
Arora A., 2011, Dimensions of Economic Theory and Policy Essays for Anjan Mukherji
[4]  
Baldwin R., 2011, Trade and Industrialisation after Globalisation's 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain Are Different and Why It Matters, DOI DOI 10.3386/W17716
[5]  
Bianco C., 2007, 31 CTR STUD SCI DEV
[6]  
Bobirca A, 2007, PROC WRLD ACAD SCI E, V24, P1
[7]  
Borchert I., 2010, SERVICE IND J, V30
[8]  
Bunyaratavej K, 2007, J INT MANAGEMENT, V13
[9]  
Capik P, 2011, EUROPEAN PLANNING ST, V19
[10]  
Castellacci F., 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA, V77