Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a new recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (DA-3801) with follitropin-α (Gonal-F®) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproductive technology

被引:18
作者
Moon, Shin Yong
Choi, Young Sik
Ku, Seung-Yup
Kim, Seok Hyun
Choi, Young Min
Kang, Inn Soo
Kim, Chung Hoon
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Reprod Med & Populat, Med Res Ctr, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; DA-3801; follitropin-alpha; recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone;
D O I
10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00529.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of a new recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; DA-3801) with follitropin-alpha (Gonal-F (R)) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: This was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority study. A total of 97 women were randomized to receive COH using DA-3801 (DA-3801 group, n = 49) or Gonal-F-(R) (Gonal-F group, n = 48). All subjects underwent COH using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved, and the secondary efficacy endpoints included the total dose of FSH, the duration of stimulation, the serum estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, and the fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates. Safety was evaluated using pre- and post-treatment laboratory tests and all adverse events were recorded. Results: The number of oocytes retrieved was 13.0 +/- 6.2 (DA-3801) versus 10.6 +/- 6.7 (Gonal-F) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and 12.7 +/- 6.4 (DA-3801) versus 11.0 +/- 7.1 (Gonal-F) in the per-protocol (PP) population. The non-inferiority of DA-3801 was demonstrated with differences of 2.3 +/- 6.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13, infinity) and 1.7 +/- 6.7 (95% CI = -0.74, infinity), respectively, in the ITT and PP populations. The total dose of FSH used (1789.8 +/- 465.5 vs 2055.6 +/- 646.7 pg/mL, P = 0.027) and duration of stimulation (8.3 +/- 1.4 vs 9.1 +/- 1.9 days, P = 0.036) in the ITT population were significantly lower in the DA-3801 group. Other secondary efficacy endpoints, including pregnancy and implantation rates and the incidence and severity of adverse events, were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that DA-3801 is not inferior to follitropin-alpha in terms of its efficacy and safety in women undergoing COH for ART.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 315
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of recombinant versus urinary-derived FSH: an update [J].
Al-Inany, H ;
Aboulghar, M ;
Mansour, R ;
Serour, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (02) :305-313
[2]   Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review [J].
Arce, JC ;
Andersen, AN ;
Collins, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (07) :1757-1771
[3]   Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F®) versus highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP®):: results of a randomized comparative study in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques [J].
Bergh, C ;
Howles, CM ;
Borg, K ;
Hamberger, L ;
Josefsson, B ;
Nilsson, L ;
Wikland, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (10) :2133-2139
[4]   HETEROGENEITY OF RAT FSH BY CHROMATOFOCUSING - STUDIES ON INVITRO BIOACTIVITY OF PITUITARY FSH FORMS AND EFFECT OF NEURAMINIDASE TREATMENT [J].
BLUM, WFP ;
RIEGELBAUER, G ;
GUPTA, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1985, 105 (01) :17-27
[5]   Heterogeneity of follicle stimulating hormone: Control and physiological function [J].
Chappel, SC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1995, 1 (05) :479-487
[6]  
Chillik C, 2001, FERTIL STERIL, V76, P950
[7]   Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction [J].
Daya, S ;
Gunby, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (09) :2207-2215
[8]   Structure-function relationship of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon®) [J].
de Leeuw, Renato ;
Mulders, John ;
Voortman, Gerrit ;
Rombout, Ferdy ;
Damm, Jan ;
Kloosterboer, Lenus .
MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1996, 2 (05) :361-369
[9]   Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle™) and recombinant follitropin-β for in vitro fertilization:: a prospective, randomized study [J].
Dickey, RP ;
Thornton, M ;
Nichols, J ;
Marshall, DC ;
Fein, SH ;
Nardi, RV .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (06) :1202-1208
[10]  
Diedrich K, 2002, FERTIL STERIL, V78, P520