Sustainability of social-ecological systems: The difference between social rules and management rules

被引:5
作者
Chiaravalloti, Rafael M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Homewood, Katherine [4 ]
Dyble, Mark [4 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Front Royal, VA USA
[2] Ctr Environm Policy Royal Soc, Imperial Coll London, London, England
[3] IPE Inst Ecol Res, Nazare Paulista, SP, Brazil
[4] UCL, Dept Anthropol, 14 Taviton St, London WC1H 0BW, England
关键词
Agta hunter-gatherers; conservation initiatives; limited open access; Maasai pastoralists; open property regime; Pantaneiro fishers; socioecological systems; sustainability; PANTANAL WETLAND; OPEN ACCESS; CONSERVATION; RESILIENCE; FISHERIES; FORAGERS; TRAGEDY; TENURE;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12826
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Most conservation and development initiatives assume that rules limiting resource extraction are necessary for ecological sustainability. While this is often true, in some social-ecological systems, unpredictable ecosystem dynamics and limited exploitation technology make it unlikely that people will overstep the ecological threshold, precluding the need for management rules. Here, two kinds of systems can emerge: open access systems in which individuals can meet their needs without cooperating with others, and a cooperative open access system in which social rules are required though management rules are not, because individuals need to cooperate to survive and to prevent erosion of cooperation by free-riders. We provide three brief case studies illustrating cooperative open access: Pantaneiro fishers, Agta hunter-gatherers, and Maasai pastoralists. We conclude that understanding these exceptions is pivotal for a better theoretical understanding of social-ecological systems, and can be valuable in building a strategic approach to conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Open access and the sovereign commons: A political ecology of pastoral land tenure [J].
Behnke, Roy .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 76 :708-718
[2]   Governing open access: livestock distributions and institutional control in the Karakum Desert of Turkmenistan [J].
Behnke, Roy ;
Robinson, Sarah ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 :103-119
[3]   FISHERMEN AND THE TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS [J].
BERKES, F .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1985, 12 (03) :199-206
[4]   Community-based management induces rapid recovery of a high-value tropical freshwater fishery [J].
Campos-Silva, Joao Vitor ;
Peres, Carlos A. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[6]   Resilience of social-ecological systems: drastic seasonal change is associated with economic but not social flexibility among fishers in the Brazilian Pantanal [J].
Chiaravalloti, Rafael M. ;
Freitas, Daniel M. ;
de Souza, Rodrigo A. ;
Biswas, Sumalika ;
Markos, Andrea ;
Manfroi, Miraira Noal ;
Dyble, Mark .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (02)
[7]   The Displacement of Insufficiently 'Traditional' Communities:Local Fisheries in the Pantanal [J].
Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 17 (02) :173-183
[8]   Limited open access in socioecological systems: How do communities deal with environmental unpredictability? [J].
Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais ;
Dyble, Mark .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2019, 12 (02)
[9]   Sustainability and Land tenure: Who owns the floodplain in the Pantanal, Brazil? [J].
Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais ;
Homewood, Katherine ;
Erikson, Kirsten .
LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 64 :511-524
[10]   Overfishing or Over Reacting? Management of Fisheries in the Pantanal Wetland, Brazil [J].
Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2017, 15 (01) :111-122