Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy

被引:109
作者
Hartshorn, K. James [1 ]
Evans, Norman W. [1 ]
Merrill, Paul F.
Sudweeks, Richard R. [2 ]
Strong-Krause, Diane
Anderson, Neil J.
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, English Language Ctr, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Instruct Psychol & Technol Dept, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
GRAMMAR-CORRECTION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; ERROR-CORRECTION; ACQUISITION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.5054/tq.2010.213781
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Though recent research has shown that written corrective feedback (WCF) may improve aspects of writing accuracy in some English as a second language (ESL) contexts, many teachers continue to be confused about the practical steps they should utilize to help their students improve their writing. Moreover, some have raised concerns as to whether commonly used approaches to ESL writing pedagogy and grammar instruction are effective in helping students improve their linguistic accuracy. This article describes an instructional strategy we developed for improving students' accuracy based on insights gleaned from practice, research, and theory. We refer to this instructional methodology as dynamic VICE The article also discusses a test of the methodology's efficacy that compared the performance of two groups of students, one using a conventional process approach to writing instruction and the other using the dynamic WCF approach. Test results demonstrated that although rhetorical competence, writing fluency, and writing complexity were largely unaffected by the dynamic WCF pedagogy, significant improvement was observed for writing accuracy. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.213781
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 109
页数:26
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GLOTTODIDACTICA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 2 LANGUAGE DEV WRITI
[3]   The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passe compose and imparfait [J].
Ayoun, D .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2001, 85 (02) :226-243
[4]   A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Bernard, RM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 1995, 13 (02) :111-127
[5]   The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J].
Bitchener, J ;
Young, S ;
Cameron, D .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2005, 14 (03) :191-205
[6]   The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (03) :409-431
[7]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[8]  
Bond T, 2021, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, V4th
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[10]  
Corder S.P., 1981, Error analysis and interlanguage