Does the price of natural resources affect firms' total factor productivity? Evidence from a natural experiment in China

被引:22
作者
Liu, Shasha [1 ]
Yin, Shanshan [1 ]
Yin, Chuan [2 ]
Sheng, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Foreign Studies, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Total factor productivity; Marketization; Misallocation of resources; Political expropriation risk; Natural resources; HIGHER-EDUCATION EXPANSION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; POLITICAL CONNECTIONS; FINANCING CONSTRAINTS; INNOVATION EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study uses a natural experiment on a market reform implemented in China in 2006 to examine how the marketization of the pricing of natural resources affects the total factor productivity (TFP) of resource-oriented firms, focusing on Chinese A-share stocks. We adopt the difference-in-differences (DIDs) approach and show that the reform has significantly improved firms' TFP. This study uses propensity score matching and dynamic DIDs and finds consistent results. Cross-sectional tests indicate that the TFP improvement is stronger for firms with greater misallocation of resources, lower political expropriation risk, and greater financial constraints. We also document that firms' TFP has a catch-up effect and show that the reform has narrowed TFP gaps between firms. Our study provides clear policy suggestions and offers evidence of the economic consequences of the reform of the natural resources market. (C) 2021 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   IDENTIFICATION PROPERTIES OF RECENT PRODUCTION FUNCTION ESTIMATORS [J].
Ackerberg, Daniel A. ;
Caves, Kevin ;
Frazer, Garth .
ECONOMETRICA, 2015, 83 (06) :2411-2451
[2]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[3]   PRODUCTIVITY AND MISALLOCATION IN GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM [J].
Baqaee, David Rezza ;
Farhi, Emmanuel .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (01) :105-163
[4]   THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY - DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS [J].
BARBERA, AJ ;
MCCONNELL, VD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (01) :50-65
[5]   Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection [J].
Bartelsman, Eric ;
Haltiwanger, John ;
Scarpetta, Stefano .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :305-334
[6]   The Unequal Effect of India's Industrial Liberalization on Firms' Decision to Innovate: Do Business Conditions Matter? [J].
Bas, Maria ;
Paunov, Caroline .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 66 (01) :205-238
[7]   Misallocation, Establishment Size, and Productivity [J].
Bento, Pedro ;
Restuccia, Diego .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2017, 9 (03) :267-303
[8]   China's R&D explosion-Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time [J].
Boeing, Philipp ;
Mueller, Elisabeth ;
Sandner, Philipp .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) :159-176
[9]   Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Tombe, Trevor ;
Zhu, Xiaodong .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 16 (01) :39-58
[10]   Do financing constraints matter for R&D? [J].
Brown, James R. ;
Martinsson, Gustav ;
Petersen, Bruce C. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (08) :1512-1529