Exploring price fairness perceptions and their influence on consumer behavior

被引:72
作者
Malc, Domen [1 ]
Mumel, Damijan [1 ]
Pisnik, Aleksandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Econ & Business, Razlagova 14, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
Price fairness; Equity theory; Income level; Consequences; SOCIAL COMPARISONS; GOOD DEAL; SATISFACTION; (UN)FAIRNESS; SITUATIONS; JUDGMENTS; PURCHASE; EMOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The price fairness concept is gaining in relevance in the marketing field, as it can be seen as a restraint on unfair exploitation, particularly regarding dynamic pricing techniques. The present paper explores the restraining nature of price fairness perceptions while testing the characteristic behavioral reactions of consumers who perceive price difference as unfair. Furthermore, this study describes the consequences of price fairness perceptions as consumer coping strategies. This study applies an experimental design: 288 participants assess the price fairness of given shopping scenarios and use those assessments to determine their agreement with different kinds of consequential behaviors. This experimental study confirms that price fairness influences not only the intention to buy but also some forms of negative behaviors that directly harm the seller, e.g., negative word of mouth, complaints, and leaving the seller. Findings also confirm that the intensity of price fairness perception correlates with the severity of consequences and that differences exist among consumers with different income levels. The main contribution is in the empirical research of previously merely theoretical propositions concerning factors and consequences of price fairness perceptions. Study confirms that social comparisons play an integral part in determining fairness in the shopping context, reveal that consumers accept and positively assess price increases over time in terms of fairness, and confirm the importance of personal income in both price fairness assessments and in consumers' reactions to unfair prices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3693 / 3697
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Selective Exposure Theory
[3]   INTERNAL STANDARDS REVISITED - EFFECTS OF SOCIAL COMPARISONS AND EXPECTANCIES ON JUDGMENTS OF FAIRNESS AND SATISFACTION [J].
AUSTIN, W ;
MCGINN, NC ;
SUSMILCH, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 16 (05) :426-441
[4]   Outraged consumers: Getting even at the expense of getting a good deal [J].
Bechwati, NN ;
Morrin, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :440-453
[5]   Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness [J].
Bolton, LE ;
Warlop, L ;
Alba, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (04) :474-491
[6]   How Do Price Fairness Perceptions Differ Across Culture? [J].
Bolton, Lisa E. ;
Keh, Hean Tat ;
Alba, Joseph W. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (03) :564-576
[7]   Angry customers don't come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services [J].
Bougie, R ;
Pieters, R ;
Zeelenberg, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 31 (04) :377-393
[8]   What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa [J].
Bradford, Ben ;
Huq, Aziz ;
Jackson, Jonathan ;
Roberts, Benjamin .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2014, 8 (02) :246-268
[9]  
BRODY CJ, 1984, SOC FORCES, V63, P209
[10]   Says who?! - How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un)fairness [J].
Campbell, Margaret C. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (02) :261-271