Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: Public perceptions, attitudes and implications for future studies

被引:21
作者
Jin, Shan [1 ]
Clark, Beth [1 ]
Kuznesof, Sharron [1 ]
Lin, Xuan [2 ]
Frewer, Lynn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] LongRun Inc, Tower B,Excellence City 2, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
关键词
Synthetic biology; Food; Agriculture; Public perception; Public attitude; Mapping review; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOODS; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; ACCEPTANCE; DESIGN; MEDIA; RISK; ACID; BIOTECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.025
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Background: Synthetic biology is an emerging multidisciplinary area of research with the potential to deliver various novel agrifood applications. Its long-term adoption and commercialisation will depend on the extent to which the public accept synthetic biology and its different applications. Scope and approach: A mapping review of existing research on public perceptions of, and attitudes towards, synthetic biology and its applications to agriculture and food production was conducted. This enabled an overview of current knowledge about public perceptions and attitudes to be developed, and current research gaps to be identified. Key findings and conclusions: Although some risk-related and ethical concerns were raised by the public, there was little evidence showing that people had an inherently negative perception of synthetic biology. The results demonstrated the importance of perceived benefits, perceived risks and ethical issues in shaping public acceptance of synthetic biology applied to agrifood production. Where analysis focused on specific applications, people tended to be more positive about medical and environmental applications compared to those in the agrifood sector. This is also the case for other areas of technology application, such as nanotechnology and genetic modification. However, at present, the literature is focused on synthetic biology as an enabling technology rather than on its specific applications. Given some evidence that people's attitudes varied by product types, more research on specific applications is therefore needed to further investigate public attitudes and codevelop societal preferences for agrifood products.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 466
页数:13
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Abbas Z, 2013, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V15, P325
[2]   Mapping the Landscape of Public Attitudes on Synthetic Biology [J].
Akin, Heather ;
Rose, Kathleen M. ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Simis-Wilkinson, Molly ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Xenos, Michael A. ;
Corley, Elizabeth A. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2017, 67 (03) :290-300
[3]  
Amin L, 2013, AFRICAN J BIOTECHNOL, V10, P12469, DOI [10.4314/ajb.v10i58, DOI 10.4314/AJB.V10I58]
[4]  
Ancillotti M, 2015, AMBIVALENCES CREATIN, P141, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9]
[5]   Uncritical and unbalanced coverage of synthetic biology in the Nordic press [J].
Ancillotti, Mirko ;
Holmberg, Niklas ;
Lindfelt, Mikael ;
Eriksson, Stefan .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (02) :235-250
[6]   An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided? [J].
Ancillotti, Mirko ;
Rerimassie, Virgil ;
Seitz, Stefanie B. ;
Steurer, Walburg .
NANOETHICS, 2016, 10 (03) :309-325
[7]   The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies [J].
Anderson, Ashley A. ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Corley, Elizabeth A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (02) :225-237
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SYNTHETIC BIOL
[9]   Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways [J].
Bar-Even, Arren ;
Noor, Elad ;
Lewis, Nathan E. ;
Milo, Ron .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (19) :8889-8894
[10]   Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis [J].
Bearth, Angela ;
Siegrist, Michael .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 49 :14-23