Deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon: A conservation struggle being lost as agreements and regulations are subverted and bypassed

被引:132
作者
Carvalho, William D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mustin, Karen [3 ,4 ]
Hilario, Renato R. [1 ,2 ]
Vasconcelos, Ivan M. [5 ]
Eilers, Vivianne [3 ,6 ]
Fearnside, Philip M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Amapa UNIFAP, Lab Ecol, Dept Meio Ambiente & Desenvolvimento, Rod Juscelino Kubitscheck S-N, BR-68903419 Macapa, AP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Amapa UNIFAP, Programa Posgrad Biodiversidade Trop, Rod Juscelino Kubitscheck S-N, BR-68903419 Macapa, AP, Brazil
[3] Univ ofAberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Zool Bldg,Tillydrone Ave, Aberdeen AB24 2TE, Scotland
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas, Programa Posgrad Biol Anim, Dept Ecol Zool & Genet, Inst Biol, BR-96010900 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[5] Inst Chico Mendes Conservacao Biodiversidade ICMB, Rua Leopoldo Machado 1126, BR-68900067 Macapa, AP, Brazil
[6] Inst Meio Ambiente & Recursos Nat Renovaveis IBAM, Rua Hamilton Silva 1570, BR-68906440 Macapa, AP, Brazil
[7] Natl Inst Res Amazonia INPA, Ave Andre Araujo 2936, BR-69067375 Manaus, AM, Brazil
关键词
Amazonian savannahs; Cerrado; Timber; Soy Moratorium; Ecosystem services; Beef agreement; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SOY PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; FOREST; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.002
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Despite efforts to reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, there has been an up-turn in clearing rates since 2012. These increases are in part due to failures in deforestation control. Soybean planters, cattle ranchers, and timber merchants find ways to circumvent agreements and legislation. Here we explain some of the key problems with the implementation of the principal agreements and Brazilian laws that should be keeping clearing rates under control. To combat increased clearing in the Amazon, we suggest an urgent need to strengthen Brazilian environmental agencies, improve technologies used to monitor the effectiveness of clearing-reduction programmes, better integrate agrarian and environmental policies and integrate environmental enforcement across federal, state and municipal governments, as well as improve transparency along global supply chains and raise awareness among consumers to put market pressure on producers to avoid new deforestation. (C) 2019 Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts [J].
Abessa, Denis ;
Fama, Ana ;
Buruaem, Lucas .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 3 (04) :510-511
[2]  
Almeida A., 2019, PROJETO F BOLSONARO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SEEG 4
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PROJ PRODES MON FLOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Levantamento de recursos naturais
[6]   Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil [J].
Arima, Eugenio Y. ;
Barreto, Paulo ;
Araujo, Elis ;
Soares-Filho, Britaldo .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 41 :465-473
[7]   Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Arima, Eugenio Y. ;
Richards, Peter ;
Walker, Robert ;
Caldas, Marcellus M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (02)
[8]   Working together for Amazonia [J].
Artaxo, Paulo .
SCIENCE, 2019, 363 (6425) :323-323
[9]   Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Asner, GP ;
Knapp, DE ;
Broadbent, EN ;
Oliveira, PJC ;
Keller, M ;
Silva, JN .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5747) :480-482
[10]   Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies? [J].
Assuncao, Juliano ;
Gandour, Clarissa ;
Rocha, Rudi .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2015, 20 (06) :697-722