The variable precision method for elicitation of probability weighting functions

被引:4
作者
Chai, Junyi [1 ]
Ngai, Eric W. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ Hong Kong Baptist Univ United, Div Business & Management, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Prospect theory; Probability weighting; Tradeoff method; Nonparametric elicitation; Behavioral decision making; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; EXPECTED-UTILITY-THEORY; PROSPECT-THEORY; SUPPLIER SELECTION; DECISION WEIGHTS; RISK-AVERSION; PREFERENCES; CHOICE; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2019.113166
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study introduces a nonparametric method to elicit decision weights under prospect theory. These weights carry the attitudes and subjective beliefs of individuals toward risks and uncertainties. Our variable precision method adopts a dynamic mechanism that can elicit the measuring points of individual probability weighting flexibly. These points are used to exhibit violations of expected utility theory, which measures individual risk attitudes and captures subjective beliefs on probabilities. Our method is flexible, tractable, and cognitively less demanding compared with other nonparametric elicitations in the literature. Experimental studies are conducted on a sample of Hong Kong (China) residents to verify our method. Our experimental results yield a prevailing inverse-S shape. We conduct the analyses and uncover their implications by comparing them with the results of residents of Beijing, Shanghai, Paris, and Amsterdam.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making
    Ojala, Karita E.
    Janssen, Lieneke K.
    Hashemi, Mahur M.
    Timmer, Monique H. M.
    Geurts, Dirk E. M.
    ter Huurne, Niels P.
    Cools, Roshan
    Sescousse, Guillaume
    [J]. ENEURO, 2018, 5 (02)
  • [42] INVERSE S-SHAPED PROBABILITY WEIGHTING AND ITS IMPACT ON INVESTMENT
    He, Xue Dong
    Kouwenberg, Roy
    Zhou, Xun Yu
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL CONTROL AND RELATED FIELDS, 2018, 8 (3-4) : 679 - 706
  • [43] Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence
    Bruhin, Adrian
    Manai, Maha
    Santos-Pinto, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2022, 65 (02) : 139 - 184
  • [44] Probability weighting functions obtained from Hong Kong index option market
    Wu, Xinyu
    Xie, Haibin
    Li, Xindan
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2019, 32 (01): : 1922 - 1943
  • [45] Does Probability Weighting Drive Lottery Preferences?
    Blau, Benjamin M.
    DeLisle, R. Jared
    Whitby, Ryan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2020, 21 (03) : 233 - 247
  • [46] Assessing risky weighting functions for positive and negative binary gambles using the logarithmic derivative function
    Barch, Daniel H.
    Chechile, Richard A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 75 : 194 - 204
  • [47] Nonlinear Probability Weighting in Depression and Anxiety: Insights From Healthy Young Adults
    Hagiwara, Kosuke
    Mochizuki, Yasuhiro
    Chen, Chong
    Lei, Huijie
    Hirotsu, Masako
    Matsubara, Toshio
    Nakagawa, Shin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [48] Seismic risk mitigation in buildings using a new method to encode a joint weighting function in multi-attribute utility theory
    Makhoul, Nisrine
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (09):
  • [49] Fitness-maximizers employ pessimistic probability weighting for decisions under risk
    Price, Michael Holton
    Jones, James Holland
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY HUMAN SCIENCES, 2020, 2
  • [50] Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting
    Shi, Yun
    Cui, Xiangyu
    Zhou, Xun Yu
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 71 (02) : 776 - 790