Comparison of three remifentanil dose-finding regimens for coronary artery surgery

被引:21
作者
Howie, MB [1 ]
Michelsen, LG
Hug, CC
Porembka, DT
Jopling, MW
Warren, SM
Shaikh, S
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[4] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Greenford, Middx, England
关键词
coronary artery bypass graft surgery; remifentanil; responses to surgical stimuli; postoperative recovery;
D O I
10.1053/jcan.2003.10
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the remifentanil dosing regimen providing safe and optimal anesthetic conditions during coronary artery bypass graft surgery and to evaluate postoperative recovery characteristics. Design: Open-label, randomized, parallel group. Setting: Three centers in the United States. Participants: Seventy-two patients with left ventricular stroke volumes greater than or equal to50 mL. Interventions: Patients were randomized to remifentanil doses of 1 mug/kg/min (group 1, n = 23); 2 mug/kg/min (group 2, n = 24), or 3 mug/kg/min (group 3, n = 25). Somatic, sympathetic, and hemodynamic responses indicating inadequate anesthesia were treated with bolus doses of remifentanil, 1 to 2 mug/kg, and infusion rate increases, and, if necessary, isoflurane 0.5% to 1.0% was added as a rescue anesthetic. In the intensive care unit, the remifentanil infusion was reset to 1 mug/kg/min, with midazolam administered for supplemental sedation and morphine for analgesia. Measurements and Main Results: The durations of anesthesia, surgery, and cardiopulmonary bypass were similar for the 3 study groups. In addition, dose of lorazepam premedication, time to loss of consciousness, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, age, weight, and sex were similar for the 3 study groups. Remifentanil alone (infusion and boluses) prevented and controlled all responses to stimulation in 44% of group 3, 37% of group 2 and 9% of group 1 patients intraoperatively. Isoflurane (0.5%-1% inspired) rescue was successful in the remaining patients in each group. Hypotension indicating discontinuation of isoflurane and reductions of remifentanil infusion rates occurred in 64% to 75% of all patients. The optimal range of remifentanil infusion was 2 to 4 mug/kg/min with isoflurane to supplement the opioid. Fifty-one patients (71%) met the criteria for extubation within 6 hours postoperatively; because of surgical practice differences, only 30 patients (59%) were actually extubated. Conclusions: After lorazepam premedication, remifentanil infusion (2-4 mug/kg/min) supplemented intermittently with low inspired concentrations of isoflurane provided an effective anesthetic regimen for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Early extubation times were feasible after remifentanil continuous infusions (1-5 mug/kg/min) used as the primary anesthetic component intraoperatively and for analgesia (less than or equal to1 mug/kg/min) in the immediate postoperative setting. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED INFUSION VERSUS INTERMITTENT BOLUS ADMINISTRATION OF ALFENTANIL AS A SUPPLEMENT TO NITROUS-OXIDE FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY [J].
AUSEMS, ME ;
VUYK, J ;
HUG, CC ;
STANSKI, DR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 68 (06) :851-861
[2]  
BOVILL JG, 1984, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V61, P731
[3]  
BOVILL JG, 1984, ANESTH ANALG, V63, P1081
[4]  
CARTWRIGHT P, 1983, ANESTH ANALG, V62, P966
[5]   PRO - EARLY EXTUBATION AFTER CARDIAC-SURGERY DECREASES INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT STAY AND COST [J].
CHENG, DCH .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1995, 9 (04) :460-464
[6]   Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Cheng, DCH ;
Karski, J ;
Peniston, C ;
Asokumar, B ;
Raveendran, G ;
Carroll, J ;
Nierenberg, H ;
Roger, S ;
Mickle, D ;
Tong, J ;
Zelovitsky, J ;
David, T ;
Sandler, A .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 112 (03) :755-764
[7]  
Cheng DCH, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1094
[8]  
CUNNINGHAM FE, 1995, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V83, pA376
[9]  
DELANGE S, 1983, CAN ANAESTH SOC J, V30, P248