Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for the Delivery of 60Co Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Subject to a 0.35-T Lateral Magnetic Field

被引:42
作者
Li, H. Harold [1 ]
Rodriguez, Vivian L. [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
Hu, Yanle [1 ]
Kashani, Rojano [1 ]
Wooten, H. Omar [1 ]
Yang, Deshan [1 ]
Mutic, Sasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2015年 / 91卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; DOSE RECONSTRUCTION; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; PASSING RATES; MRI SCANNER; IMRT QA; DOSIMETRY; BEAMS; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This work describes a patient-specific dosimetry quality assurance (QA) program for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using ViewRay, the first commercial magnetic resonance imaging-guided RT device. Methods and Materials: The program consisted of: (1) a 1-dimensional multipoint ionization chamber measurement using a customized 15-cm(3) cube-shaped phantom; (2) 2-dimensional (2D) radiographic film measurement using a 30- x 30- x 20-cm(3) phantom with multiple inserted ionization chambers; (3) quasi-3D diode array (ArcCHECK) measurement with a centrally inserted ionization chamber; (4) 2D fluence verification using machine delivery log files; and (5) 3D Monte Carlo (MC) dose reconstruction with machine delivery files and phantom CT. Results: Ionization chamber measurements agreed well with treatment planning system (TPS)-computed doses in all phantom geometries where the mean +/- SD difference was 0.0% +/- 1.3% (n=102; range, -3.0%-2.9%). Film measurements also showed excellent agreement with the TPS-computed 2D dose distributions where the mean passing rate using 3% relative/3 mm gamma criteria was 94.6% +/- 3.4% (n=30; range, 87.4%-100%). For ArcCHECK measurements, the mean +/- SD passing rate using 3% relative/3 mm gamma criteria was 98.9% +/- 1.1% (n=34; range, 95.8%-100%). 2D fluence maps with a resolution of 1 x 1 mm(2) showed 100% passing rates for all plan deliveries (n=34). The MC reconstructed doses to the phantom agreed well with planned 3D doses where the mean passing rate using 3% absolute/3 mm gamma criteria was 99.0% +/- 1.0% (n=18; range, 97.0%-100%), demonstrating the feasibility of evaluating the QA results in the patient geometry. Conclusions: We developed a dosimetry program for ViewRay's patient-specific IMRT QA. The methodology will be useful for other ViewRay users. The QA results presented here can assist the RT community to establish appropriate tolerance and action limits for ViewRay's IMRT QA. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Polymer gel dosimetry [J].
Baldock, C. ;
De Deene, Y. ;
Doran, S. ;
Ibbott, G. ;
Jirasek, A. ;
Lepage, M. ;
McAuley, K. B. ;
Oldham, M. ;
Schreiner, L. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (05) :R1-R63
[2]   Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification [J].
Bedford, James L. ;
Lee, Young K. ;
Wai, Philip ;
South, Christopher P. ;
Warrington, Alan P. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) :N167-N176
[3]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[4]   Cross-validation of two commercial methods for volumetric high-resolution dose reconstruction on a phantom for non-coplanar VMAT beams [J].
Feygelman, Vladimir ;
Stambaugh, Cassandra ;
Opp, Daniel ;
Zhang, Geoffrey ;
Moros, Eduardo G. ;
Nelms, Benjamin E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (03) :558-561
[5]   On the Need for Comprehensive Validation of Deformable Image Registration, Investigated With a Novel 3-Dimensional Deformable Dosimeter [J].
Juang, Titania ;
Das, Shiva ;
Adamovics, John ;
Benning, Ron ;
Oldham, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02) :414-421
[6]   Patient dosimetry for hybrid MRI-radiotherapy systems [J].
Kirkby, C. ;
Stanescu, T. ;
Rathee, S. ;
Carlone, M. ;
Murray, B. ;
Fallone, B. G. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (03) :1019-1027
[7]   Optimizing the accuracy of a helical diode array dosimeter: A comprehensive calibration methodology coupled with a novel virtual inclinometer [J].
Kozelka, Jakub ;
Robinson, Joshua ;
Nelms, Benjamin ;
Zhang, Geoffrey ;
Savitskij, Dennis ;
Feygelman, Vladimir .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (09) :5021-5032
[8]   COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40 [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
COIA, L ;
GILLIN, M ;
HANSON, WF ;
LEIBEL, S ;
MORTON, RJ ;
PALTA, JR ;
PURDY, JA ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
SVENSSON, GK ;
WELLER, M ;
WINGFIELD, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :581-618
[9]   Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
LoSasso, T ;
Chui, CS ;
Ling, CC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1919-1927
[10]   Phantoms for IMRT dose distribution measurement and treatment verification [J].
Low, DA ;
Gerber, RL ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (05) :1231-1235