Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions

被引:60
作者
Chan, Tat Y. [1 ]
Kadiyali, Vrinda
Park, Young-Hoon
机构
[1] Washington Univ, John M Olin Sch Business, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Johnson Grad Sch Management, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.44.2.324
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors model how to measure consumer willingness to pay (WTP) using an English, or ascending first-price, auction based on two general bidding premises: No bidder bids more than his or her WTP, and no bidder allows a rival bidder to win at a price that he or she is willing to beat. In other words, the authors propose a '' no-regret '' rule in bidding. They impose no other restrictive assumptions on '' maximands '' or the bidders' behaviors in a competitive auction context. The authors model WTP as having two components: a pure product feature component and one based on the auction market environment. The latter includes bidder experience, seller reputation, and measures for competition among bidders and items. The proposed model is general enough to include a '' buy-it-now '' (equivalent to a posted price) auction mechanism. The authors use data on notebook auctions from one of the largest Internet auction sites in Korea. They find that most product characteristics matter in the expected ways. There are two additional primary findings: First, WTP declines as more similar items are concurrently listed with the focal item; there is an additional effect if these similar items also belong to the same brand. Therefore, market thickness matters for consumer WTR Second, more extensive site surfing and bidding histories lead to lower WTP, implying that search costs and experience matter in bidding. As specific substantive benefits, the authors demonstrate how sellers can calculate changes in WTP and, thus, the expected revenue as the number of concurrently available similar items varies.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 333
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   AN ELIMINATION BY ASPECTS MODEL OF CONSUMER RESPONSE TO PROMOTION CALIBRATED ON UPC SCANNER DATA [J].
FADER, PS ;
MCALISTER, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1990, 27 (03) :322-332
[12]   Inference with an incomplete model of English auctions [J].
Haile, PA ;
Tamer, E .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (01) :1-51
[13]   An "alternating recognition" model of English auctions [J].
Harstad, RM ;
Rothkopf, MH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (01) :1-12
[14]   Econometric models of asymmetric ascending auctions [J].
Hong, H ;
Shum, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 112 (02) :327-358
[15]  
Jin G. Z, 2004, BLIND TRUST ONLINE E
[16]  
Leszczyc Peter T.L. Popkowski, 2005, SIGNAL EFFECT BUY NO
[17]   Econometrics of first-price auctions with entry and binding reservation prices [J].
Li, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (01) :173-200
[18]   Bidding behavior and decision costs in field experiments [J].
List, JA ;
Lucking-Reiley, D .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2002, 40 (04) :611-619
[19]  
LUCKINGREILEY D, 2005, PENNIES EBAY DETERMI
[20]  
Melnik MI, 2002, J IND ECON, V50, P337