Complications of Antireflux Surgery

被引:82
|
作者
Yadlapati, Rena [1 ]
Hungness, Eric S. [2 ]
Pandolfino, John E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION; NATIONAL TRENDS; MANAGEMENT; SYMPTOMS; POSTFUNDOPLICATION; OUTCOMES; GERD; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41395-018-0115-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Antireflux surgery anatomically restores the antireflux barrier and is a therapeutic option for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease or PPI intolerance. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the standard antireflux surgery, though its popularity has declined due to concerns regarding wrap durability and adverse events. As the esophagogastric junction is an anatomically complex and dynamic area subject to mechanical stress, wraps are susceptible to disruption, herniation or slippage. Additionally, recreating an antireflux barrier to balance bidirectional bolus flow is challenging, and wraps may be too tight or too loose. Given these complexities it is not surprising that post-fundoplication symptoms and complications are common. Perioperative mortality rates range from 0.1 to 0.2% and prolonged structural complications occur in up to 30% of cases. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with a comprehensive retroflexed examination of the fundoplication and barium esophagram are the primary tests to assess for structural complications. Management hinges on differentiating complications that can be managed with medical and lifestyle optimization versus those that require surgical revision. Reoperation is best reserved for severe structural abnormalities and troublesome symptoms despite medical and endoscopic therapy given its increased morbidity and mortality. Though further data are needed, magnetic sphincter augmentation may be a safer alternative to fundoplication.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic antireflux surgery - German experience
    Fuchs, KH
    Heimbucher, J
    Freys, SM
    Fein, M
    Thiede, A
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1998, 123 (10): : 1152 - 1156
  • [22] Pain after laparoscopic antireflux surgery
    Bunting, D. M.
    Szczebiot, L.
    Peyser, P. M.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2014, 96 (02) : 95 - 100
  • [23] Effect of surgeon on outcome of antireflux surgery
    Kundhal, Pavi Singh
    Harnish, Julie L.
    Urbach, David R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (06): : 902 - 906
  • [24] Gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications for antireflux surgery, outcomes, and side effects
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    Bertona, Sofia
    Herbella, Fernando A. M.
    Patti, Marco G.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 18 (11) : 693 - 703
  • [25] TAILORED ANTIREFLUX SURGERY
    Kala, Z.
    Weber, P.
    Prochazka, V.
    Dolina, J.
    Kysela, P.
    Marek, F.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2008, 12 (09) : 678 - 680
  • [26] Laparoscopic antireflux surgery
    M.G. Patti
    S. Perretta
    P.M. Fisichella
    A. D'Avanzo
    C. Galvani
    V. Gorodner
    L.W. Way
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 (3): : 386 - 389
  • [27] Results in Antireflux Surgery, an Analysis of Case-Controlled Cohorts versus Multicenter Studies and Meta-Analyses
    Fuchs, Karl-Hermann
    Varga, Gabor
    Papp, Andras
    Meining, Alexander
    CHIRURGIA, 2022, 117 (02) : 134 - 142
  • [28] Tailored antireflux surgery
    Z. Kala
    P. Weber
    V. Prochazka
    J. Dolina
    P. Kysela
    F. Marek
    The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 2008, 12 (9)
  • [29] Evaluation of the LINX antireflux procedure
    Sheu, Eric G.
    Rattner, David W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 31 (04) : 334 - 338
  • [30] The Durability of Antireflux Surgery
    Spechler, Stuart J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (10): : 913 - 915