Stakeholder Engagement for Corporate Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of B2C and B2B Companies

被引:35
作者
Johnson, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Redlbacher, Friederike [2 ]
Schaltegger, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Management, Luneburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Rentzelstr 7, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
corporate sustainability; stakeholder engagement; customer segment; sustainability reporting; environmental management; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TO-BUSINESS RESEARCH; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; RELATIVE PRESENCE; PERFORMANCE; CSR; MOTIVATIONS; DISCLOSURE; STRATEGIES; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1484
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stakeholder engagement is vital for corporate sustainability for various reasons from securing legitimacy to spurring innovation. While stakeholder engagement is well established in academic discourse, recent studies have examined the effects of customer segments on this engagement for corporate sustainability. Initial empirical analyses indicated that business-to-consumer companies are more frequently scrutinized on their sustainability activities than business-to-business companies, and subsequently they are more likely to report on sustainability activities. Nevertheless, further approaches of stakeholder engagement, including stakeholder engagement tools, environmental management standards, and various activities, have not been investigated thus far. This paper compares various approaches of stakeholder engagement according to customer segment based on a 2012 empirical study of large German companies. The results show that customer segment has no major significant influence on stakeholder engagement, but rather value-oriented aspects of firms, including family-run operations and sustainability values in a company's business, make a difference to these activities. Copyright (c) 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 673
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review [J].
Ali, Waris ;
Frynas, Jedrzej George ;
Mahmood, Zeeshan .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (04) :273-294
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 500 GRO 10 UNTERNEHM
[3]   THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES OF INTERNATIONAL FIRMS: OLD CONTROVERSIES AND NEW EVIDENCE ON PERFORMANCE AND DISCLOSURE [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Marcus, Alfred ;
Hurtado-Torres, Nuria .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (01) :24-39
[4]   Environmental Reporting: Transparency to Stakeholders or Stakeholder Manipulation? An Analysis of Disclosure Tone and the Role of the Board of Directors [J].
Arena, Claudia ;
Bozzolan, Saverio ;
Michelon, Giovanna .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 22 (06) :346-361
[5]   Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001 [J].
Bansal, P ;
Hunter, T .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 46 (03) :289-299
[6]   The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance [J].
Baron, David P. ;
Harjoto, Maretno Agus ;
Jo, Hoje .
BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2011, 13 (02)
[7]   20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management - what has been achieved? [J].
Beske-Janssen, Philip ;
Johnson, Matthew Phillip ;
Schaltegger, Stefan .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (06) :664-680
[8]   Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US [J].
Boesso, Giacomo ;
Kumar, Kamalesh .
ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2009, 33 (02) :162-175
[9]  
Bowen F.E., 2000, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V9, P92, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(200003/04)9:2andlt
[10]  
92::AID-BSE230andgt