Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery

被引:85
作者
FitzGerald, Mary P.
Weber, Anne M.
Howden, Nancy
Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
Brown, Mort B.
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[2] NICHHD, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Western Carolina Specialty Ctr, Asheville, NC USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ff
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery and to identify opportunities for preventing this cause of fecal incontinence in young women. METHODS: We used baseline data from two groups of women who participated in the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms (CAPS) study: those women who delivered vaginally, either those with or those without a recognized anal sphincter tear. Univariable analyses of demographic and obstetric information identified factors associated with anal sphincter tear. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these factors alone and in combination, adjusted for maternal age, race, and gestational age. RESULTS: We included data from 797 primaparous women: 407 with a recognized anal sphincter tear and 390 without. Based on univariable analysis, a woman with a sphincter tear was more likely to be older, to be white, to have longer gestation or prolonged second stage of labor, to have a larger infant (birth weight/head circumference), or an infant who was in occiput posterior position, or to have an episiotomy or operative delivery. Logistic regression found forceps delivery (OR 13.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9-23.2) and episiotomy (OR 5.3, 95% CI 3.8-7.6) were strongly associated with a sphincter tear. The combination of forceps and episiotomy was markedly associated with sphincter tear (OR 25.3, 95% CI 10.2-62.6). The addition of epidural anesthesia to forceps and episiotomy increased the OR to 41.0 (95% CI 13.5-124.4). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the existence of modifiable obstetric interventions that increase the risk of anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. Our results may be used by clinicians and women to help inform their decisions regarding obstetric interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery:: The University of Miami experience [J].
Angioli, R ;
Gómez-Marín, O ;
Cantuaria, G ;
O'Sullivan, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1083-1085
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J PELVIC MED SURG
[3]   Anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery in primiparous females [J].
Belmonte-Montes, C ;
Hagerman, G ;
Vega-Yepez, PA ;
Hernández-de-Anda, E ;
Fonseca-Morales, V .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (09) :1244-1248
[4]   The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries [J].
Benavides, L ;
Wu, JM ;
Hundley, AF ;
Ivester, TS ;
Visco, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (05) :1702-1706
[5]  
Bofill JA, 1996, OBSTET GYNECOL, V88, P1007
[6]   Forceps and vacuum delivery: A survey of North American residency programs [J].
Bofill, JA ;
Rust, OA ;
Perry, KG ;
Roberts, WE ;
Martin, RW ;
Morrison, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :622-625
[7]   Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women [J].
Borello-France, Diane ;
Burgio, Kathryn L. ;
Richter, Holly E. ;
Zyczynski, Halina ;
FitzGerald, Mary Pat ;
Kitehead, William ;
Fine, Paul ;
Nygaard, Ingrid ;
Handa, Victoria L. ;
Visco, Anthony G. ;
Weber, Anne M. ;
Brown, Morton B. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (04) :863-872
[8]   Forceps compared with vacuum - Rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity [J].
Caughey, AB ;
Sandberg, PL ;
Zlatnik, MG ;
Thiet, MP ;
Parer, JT ;
Laros, RK .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (05) :908-912
[9]  
CRAWFORD LA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P527
[10]   Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery [J].
de Leeuw, JW ;
Struijk, PC ;
Vierhout, ME ;
Wallenburg, HCS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04) :383-387