Particle deposition modeling in the secondary side of a steam generator bundle model

被引:7
作者
Mukin, Roman [1 ]
Dehbi, Abdel [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
LANGEVIN-EQUATION; CHANNEL FLOW; TURBULENT; DISPERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.09.001
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
A steam generator (SG) tube rupture (SGTR) model is studied in this paper. This model based on a experimental facility called Aerosol Trapping In a Steam Generator (ARTIST), which is a model of a scaled steam generator tube bundle consisting of 270 tubes and a guillotine tube to address aerosol deposition phenomena on two different scales: near the tube break, where the gas velocities and turbulence are very intensive, and far away from the break, where the flow velocities are three orders of magnitude lower. Owing to complexity of the flow, 3D simulations with highly resolved computational mesh near the break were done. First, the flow inside an isolated tube with a guillotine tube break has been studied in the framework of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) approach. The next part is devoted to the simulation of an inclined gas jet entering the SG tube bundle via the guillotine tube breach with more advanced CFD tools. In particular, Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and RANS are applied to tackle the wide range of flow scales. Flow field velocity comparison showed that DES results are reproducing wavy structure of the flow field in far field from the break observed in experiment. Particle transport and deposition is modelled by Lagrangian continuous random walk (CRW) model, which has been developed and validated previously. It is found that the DES combined with the CRW to supply fluctuating velocity components predicts deposition rates that are generally within the scatter of the measured data. Monodisperse, spherical SiO2 particles with AMMD = 1.4 mu m were used as aerosol particles in simulations. To be economically feasible, the computations were made with the open source CFD code OpenFOAM. Comparison of the calculated flow with the experimental axial velocity distribution data at different vertical levels has been performed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 123
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A hybrid LES/RANS approach using an anisotropy-resolving algebraic turbulence model [J].
Abe, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2005, 26 (02) :204-222
[2]   LOW-REYNOLDS-NUMBER EFFECTS IN A FULLY-DEVELOPED TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW [J].
ANTONIA, RA ;
TEITEL, M ;
KIM, J ;
BROWNE, LWB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1992, 236 :579-605
[3]  
Berg T., 2008, ANS
[4]   Random walk models for particle diffusion in free-shear flows [J].
Bocksell, TL ;
Loth, E .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (06) :1086-1096
[8]   Probability density function and Reynolds-stress modeling of near-wall turbulent flows [J].
Dreeben, TD ;
Pope, SB .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1997, 9 (01) :154-163
[9]   ARTIST:: introduction and first results [J].
Güntay, S ;
Suckow, D ;
Dehbi, A ;
Kapulla, R .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2004, 231 (01) :109-120
[10]  
GUNTAY S, 1999, 27 WAT REACT SAF INF