Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis

被引:149
作者
Green, JRB
Lobo, AJ
Holdsworth, CD
Leicester, RJ
Gibson, JA
Kerr, GD
Hodgson, HJF
Parkins, KJ
Taylor, MD
机构
[1] City Gen Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Stoke On Trent ST4 6QG, Staffs, England
[2] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, London, England
[4] Stafford Dist Gen Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Stafford, England
[5] Royal Shrewsbury Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Shrewsbury, Salop, England
[6] Hammersmith Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, London, England
[7] Astra Pharmaceut Ltd, Clin Res Operat Dept, Kings Langley, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70627-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Aminosalicylates are widely used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Balsalazide is a novel mesalamine prodrug, activated by colonic bacteria. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of balsalazide with that of a pH-dependent formulation of mesalamine in active UC. Methods: A randomized, double-blind study was performed comparing balsalazide, 6.75 g daily, with mesalamine, 2.4 g daily, administered for 4, 8, or 12 weeks to 101 (99 evaluable) patients with symptomatic, sigmoidoscopically verified UC. Results: More patients treated with balsalazide achieved symptomatic remission after 2 (64% [balsalazide] vs. 43% [mesalamine]), 4 (70% vs. 51%), 8 (78% vs. 45%), and 12 weeks (88% vs. 57%) and complete remission (none/mild symptoms, sigmoidoscopy grade 0/1, no rectal steroid use within 4 days) after 4 (38%;, vs. 12%), 8 (54% vs. 22%), and 12 weeks (62% vs. 37%). Patients taking balsalazide experienced more asymptomatic days (4 weeks, 24% vs. 14%) and achieved the first asymptomatic day more rapidly (median, 10 vs. 25 days). Fewer patients in the balsalazide group reported adverse events (48% vs. 71%); four serious adverse events occurred in the mesalamine group. Conclusions: Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine as treatment for acute UC.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Green JRB, 1993, INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY, V2, P289, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02660619
[12]  
HANAUER S, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1188
[13]   MEDICAL THERAPY OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
HANAUER, SB .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8868) :412-417
[14]  
HANAUER SB, 1990, THERAPY INFLAMMATORY, P65
[15]   DRUG MANAGEMENT OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
KAMM, MA ;
SENAPATI, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6844) :35-38
[16]  
MANSFIELD JC, 1991, GUT, V32, pA1217
[17]   SOME ASPECTS OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
MAYBERRY, JF .
GUT, 1985, 26 (09) :968-974
[18]  
MCINTYRE PB, 1988, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V2, P237
[19]   REVERSAL WITH BALSALAZIDE OF INFERTILITY CAUSED BY SULPHASALAZINE [J].
MCINTYRE, PB ;
LENNARDJONES, JE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6431) :1652-1653
[20]  
MISIEWICZ JJ, 1965, LANCET, V1, P185