Optimal Sensor Placement for Reliable Virtual Sensing Using Modal Expansion and Information Theory

被引:28
作者
Ercan, Tulay [1 ]
Papadimitriou, Costas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Mech Engn, Volos 38334, Volos, Greece
关键词
information gain; Kullback-Leibler divergence; relative entropy; Bayesian inference; response predictions; BAYESIAN EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES; PARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION; VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS; NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION; SYSTEM-DESIGN; ENTROPY; METHODOLOGY; LOCATION; STRAIN;
D O I
10.3390/s21103400
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A framework for optimal sensor placement (OSP) for virtual sensing using the modal expansion technique and taking into account uncertainties is presented based on information and utility theory. The framework is developed to handle virtual sensing under output-only vibration measurements. The OSP maximizes a utility function that quantifies the expected information gained from the data for reducing the uncertainty of quantities of interest (QoI) predicted at the virtual sensing locations. The utility function is extended to make the OSP design robust to uncertainties in structural model and modeling error parameters, resulting in a multidimensional integral of the expected information gain over all possible values of the uncertain parameters and weighted by their assigned probability distributions. Approximate methods are used to compute the multidimensional integral and solve the optimization problem that arises. The Gaussian nature of the response QoI is exploited to derive useful and informative analytical expressions for the utility function. A thorough study of the effect of model, prediction and measurement errors and their uncertainties, as well as the prior uncertainties in the modal coordinates on the selection of the optimal sensor configuration is presented, highlighting the importance of accounting for robustness to errors and other uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms [J].
Abdullah, MM ;
Richardson, A ;
Hanif, J .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (08) :1167-1184
[2]  
Argyris C., 2017, J. Smart Cities, V2, P69, DOI DOI 10.18063/JSC.2016.02.001
[3]  
Argyris C., 2010, THESIS U THESSALY VO
[4]  
Argyris C., 2021, MECH SYST SIGNAL PR, V161, DOI [10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107950, DOI 10.1016/J.YMSSP.2021.107950]
[5]   Comparison of Full Field Strain Distributions to Predicted Strain Distributions from Limited Sets of Measured Data for SHM Applications [J].
Avitabile, Peter ;
Harvey, Eric ;
Ruddock, Justin .
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 569-570 :1140-1147
[6]  
Bang HJ, 2012, IEEE IMTC P, P496
[7]   Modal Expansion using Strain Mode Shapes [J].
Baqersad, Javad ;
Bharadwaj, Kedar ;
Poozesh, Peyman .
SHOCK & VIBRATION, AIRCRAFT/AEROSPACE, ENERGY HARVESTING, ACOUSTICS & OPTICS, VOL 9: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH IMAC, 2017, :219-226
[8]   Emerging Trends in Optimal Structural Health Monitoring System Design: From Sensor Placement to System Evaluation [J].
Barthorpe, Robert James ;
Worden, Keith .
JOURNAL OF SENSOR AND ACTUATOR NETWORKS, 2020, 9 (03)
[9]   A methodology to design measurement systems when multiple model classes are plausible [J].
Bertola, Numa J. ;
Pai, Sai G. S. ;
Smith, Ian F. C. .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING, 2021, 11 (02) :315-336
[10]   Optimal Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Structural Identification by Static-Load Testing [J].
Bertola, Numa Joy ;
Papadopoulou, Maria ;
Vernay, Didier ;
Smith, Ian F. C. .
SENSORS, 2017, 17 (12)