Quality Talk: Developing Students' Discourse to Promote High-level Comprehension

被引:87
作者
Murphy, P. Karen [1 ]
Greene, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Firetto, Carla M. [3 ]
Hendrick, Brendan D. [4 ,5 ]
Li, Mengyi [6 ]
Montalbano, Cristin [7 ]
Wei, Liwei [8 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Educ, 102 CEDAR Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Educ, Educ Psychol & Learning Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers Coll, Educ Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Guilford Cty Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Amer Inst Res, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Sch Psychol Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[8] Penn State Univ, Coll Educ, Educ Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
argumentation; classroom discussion; critical thinking; Quality Talk; reading comprehension; AREA READING ASSIGNMENTS; EPISTEMIC COGNITION; CLASSROOM; ARGUMENTATION; DISCUSSIONS; INSTRUCTION; TEACHERS; TEXT; IMPLEMENTATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.3102/0002831218771303
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Students often struggle to comprehend complex text. In response, we conducted an initial, year-long study of Quality Talk, a teacher-facilitated, small-group discussion approach designed to enhance students' basic and high-level comprehension, in two fourth-grade classrooms. Specifically, teachers delivered instructional mini-lessons on discourse elements (e.g., questioning or argumentation) and conducted weekly text-based discussions in their language arts classes. Analysis of the videorecorded discussions showed decreases in teacher-initiated discourse elements, indicating a release of responsibility to students, whereas students' discourse reflected increased critical-analytic thinking (e.g., elaborated explanations or exploratory talk). Importantly, statistically and practically significant increases were evidenced on written measures of students' basic and high-level comprehension, indicating the promise of small-group discourse as a way to foster individual student learning outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1160
页数:48
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Adams M.J., 1990, BEGINNING READ THINK
[2]   How students and teachers in Singapore and the United States conceptualize knowledge and beliefs: Positioning learning within epistemological frameworks [J].
Alexander, PA ;
Murphy, PK ;
Guan, J ;
Murphy, PA .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1998, 8 (02) :97-116
[4]   WHAT TEACHERS DO WHEN THEY SAY THEYRE HAVING DISCUSSIONS OF CONTENT AREA READING ASSIGNMENTS - A QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS [J].
ALVERMANN, DE ;
OBRIEN, DG ;
DILLON, DR .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1990, 25 (04) :296-322
[5]   CLASSROOM DISCUSSION OF CONTENT AREA READING ASSIGNMENTS - AN INTERVENTION STUDY [J].
ALVERMANN, DE ;
HAYES, DA .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1989, 24 (03) :305-335
[6]  
Anderson RC, 1998, LITERACY FOR ALL, P170
[7]   The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Nguyen-Jahiel, K ;
McNurlen, B ;
Archodidou, A ;
Kim, SY ;
Reznitskaya, A ;
Tillmanns, M ;
Gilbert, L .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2001, 19 (01) :1-46
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[9]  
[Anonymous], INTR SHAR INQ
[10]  
[Anonymous], Trends shaping education, DOI DOI 10.1787/TRENDS_EDU-2013-EN