Functional outcomes among sexual minority youth emancipating from the child welfare system

被引:22
作者
Shpiegel, Svetlana [1 ]
Simmel, Cassandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Montclair State Univ, Robert D McCormick Ctr Child Advocacy & Policy, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, 536 George St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Aging-out; Sexual minority; Adolescents; Child welfare; Outcomes; FOSTER; GAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.012
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The heterogeneity of youth emancipating from the foster care system makes it difficult to establish the extent to which their functional outcomes are equivalent across different subgroups. In the present study, we use secondary data from the Multi Site Evaluation of Foster Youth Programs (MSEYP) to explore the challenges faced by sexual minority youths in comparison to their heterosexual peers. We focus on measurements of key independent living outcomes at age 19 to obtain a broad picture of how sexual minority youth fare during the period of transition to adulthood. Bivariate results indicate that the deficits for sexual minority youth are noteworthy across all categories of functional outcomes (i.e. education, employment, homelessness and financial stability). Furthermore, results from binary logistic regression models indicate that sexual orientation was associated with each category of functional outcomes, even when controlling for demographics and child welfare history factors. Findings suggest that sexual minority youth leaving foster care are particularly vulnerable to negative outcomes and may require more intensive supports during the period of transition to adulthood. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 108
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Barth R.P., 1990, CHILD ADOLESC SOC WO, V7, P419, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00756380, 10.1007/bf00756380]
[2]  
Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2013, SUPP LGBTQ YOUTH GUI
[3]  
Commissioner Administration for Children and Families, 2011, ACYFCBIM1103 US DEP
[4]  
Courtney M., 2006, Child and Family Social Work, V11, P209, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2206.2006.00433.X, 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00433.x]
[5]  
Courtney ME., 2009, SOC POLICY REP, V23, P1
[6]  
Craig S. L, 2012, J SOCIAL SERVICE RES, V38, P179
[7]  
Dworsky A., 2013, 201241 US DEP HHS OF
[8]  
Elze D., 2014, Child welfare for the 21st century: A handbook of practices, policies, and programs, V2nd, P158
[9]  
Estrada R., 2006, Temple law review, V79, P415
[10]  
Freundlich M., 2004, J GAY LESBIAN SOCIAL, V17, P39, DOI DOI 10.1300/J041V17N04_03