Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dermoscopy in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial

被引:45
作者
Koelink, C. J. L. [1 ]
Vermeulen, K. M. [2 ]
Kollen, B. J. [1 ]
de Bock, G. H. [2 ]
Dekker, J. H. [1 ]
Jonkman, M. F. [3 ]
van der Heide, W. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Dermatol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; SKIN-LESIONS; MELANOMA; DERMATOSCOPY; NETHERLANDS; MANAGEMENT; CHECKLIST; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.12306
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe dermoscope improves general practitioners' (GP) sensitivity for melanoma. However, diagnostic accuracy (DA) and cost-effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for the evaluation of all skin lesions suspected of malignancy remains unknown. ObjectivesTo determine the DA and cost-effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for skin lesions suspected of malignancy. MethodsIn a cluster randomized clinical trial, 48 Dutch general practices were randomized to either intervention group using a dermoscope or control group using only naked-eye examination. A total of 194 lesions from 170 patients in the intervention group and 222 lesions from 211 patients in the control group were analysed for DA and cost-effectiveness. ResultsThe percentage of correctly diagnosed lesions in intervention group and control group was 50.5% and 40.5% respectively. This was 61.5% and 22.2% for melanomas. In the intervention group, three malignancies were treated with the expectative treatment option compared to none in the control group. The odds ratio (OR) of a correct diagnosis in the intervention group, compared to control group, was 1.51 (95% CI: 0.96-2.37) P=0.07. Consequently, the relative risk was 1.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was Euro89 (95% CI -Euro60 to Euro598), indicating that using a dermoscope costs an additional Euro89 for one additional correctly diagnosed patient. Additional analyses showed better effects of dermoscopy compared to the control group for 98% of the bootstrap resamples. ConclusionsThe probability of a correct diagnosis was 1.25 times higher using a dermoscope than without a dermoscope. Although this difference is marginally not statistically significant, dermoscopy in general practice appears to be cost effective. We therefore think that GPs should be trained to use a dermoscope, although they should realize that even with the use of a dermoscope not all lesions will be diagnosed correctly.
引用
收藏
页码:1442 / 1449
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer [J].
Argenziano, G ;
Puig, S ;
Zalaudek, I ;
Sera, F ;
Corona, R ;
Alsina, M ;
Barbato, F ;
Carrera, C ;
Ferrara, G ;
Guilabert, A ;
Massi, D ;
Moreno-Romero, JA ;
Muñoz-Santos, C ;
Petrillo, G ;
Segura, S ;
Soyer, HP ;
Zanchini, R ;
Malvehy, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (12) :1877-1882
[2]   Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions - Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-Point checklist based on pattern analysis [J].
Argenziano, G ;
Fabbrocini, G ;
Carli, P ;
De Giorgi, V ;
Sammarco, E ;
Delfino, M .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (12) :1563-1570
[3]   Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions [J].
Benvenuto-Andrade, Cristiane ;
Dusza, Stephen W. ;
Agero, Anna Liza C. ;
Scope, Alon ;
Rajadhyaksha, Milind ;
Halpern, Allan C. ;
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 143 (03) :329-338
[4]   EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY - A USEFUL TOOL FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PIGMENTED SKIN-LESIONS FOR FORMALLY TRAINED DERMATOLOGISTS [J].
BINDER, M ;
SCHWARZ, M ;
WINKLER, A ;
STEINER, A ;
KAIDER, A ;
WOLFF, K ;
PEHAMBERGER, H .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 131 (03) :286-291
[5]  
de Vries E, 2006, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V150, P1108
[6]   Predictions of skin cancer incidence in the Netherlands up to 2015 [J].
de Vries, E ;
van de Poll-Franse, LV ;
Louwman, WJ ;
de Gruijl, FR ;
Coebergh, JWW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2005, 152 (03) :481-488
[7]  
de Vries Esther, 2009, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V153, pA768
[8]   Dermoscopy in the diagnosis and management of non-melanoma skin cancers [J].
Fargnoli, Maria Concetta ;
Kostaki, Dimitra ;
Piccioni, Antonella ;
Micantonio, Tamara ;
Peris, Ketty .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :456-463
[9]  
Herschorn A, 2012, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V58, pe372
[10]  
Herschorn A, 2012, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V58, P740