Mapping landslide susceptibility with frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights of evidence models: a case study in northern Iran

被引:107
作者
Razavizadeh, Samaneh [1 ]
Solaimani, Karim [2 ]
Massironi, Matteo [3 ]
Kavian, Ataollah [2 ]
机构
[1] AREEO, Res Inst Forests & Rangelands, Tehran, Iran
[2] Sari Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Watershed Management, Sari, Iran
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Geosci, Padua, Italy
关键词
Susceptibility modeling; Geographic information systems (GISs); Bivariate statistics; Mazandaran Province; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREE; HAZARD; AREA; MOUNTAINS; MACHINE; SUPPORT; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-017-6839-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to investigate potential application of frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WoE), and statistical index (SI) models for landslide susceptibility mapping in a part of Mazandaran Province, Iran. First, a landslide inventory map was constructed from various sources. The landslide inventory map was then randomly divided in a ratio of 70/30 for training and validation of the models, respectively. Second, 13 landslide conditioning factors including slope degree, slope aspect, altitude, plan curvature, stream power index, topographic wetness index, sediment transport index, topographic roughness index, lithology, distance from streams, faults, roads, and land use type were prepared, and the relationships between these factors and the landslide inventory map were extracted by using the mentioned models. Subsequently, the multi-class weighted factors were used to generate landslide susceptibility maps. Finally, the susceptibility maps were verified and compared using several methods including receiver operating characteristic curve with the areas under the curve (AUC), landslide density, and spatially agreed area analyses. The success rate curve showed that the AUC for FR, WoE, and SI models was 81.51, 79.43, and 81.27, respectively. The prediction rate curve demonstrated that the AUC achieved by the three models was 80.44, 77.94, and 79.55, respectively. Although the sensitivity analysis using the FR model revealed that the modeling process was sensitive to input factors, the accuracy results suggest that the three models used in this study can be effective approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Mazandaran Province, and the resultant susceptibility maps are trustworthy for hazard mitigation strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Anderson MG, 2013, COMMUNITY-BASED LANDSLIDE RISK REDUCTION: MANAGING DISASTERS IN SMALL STEPS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9456-4
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Data Analysis Multivariate
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, THESIS
[4]   Identification and mapping of recent rainfall-induced landslides using elevation data collected by airborne Lidar [J].
Ardizzone, F. ;
Cardinali, M. ;
Galli, M. ;
Guzzetti, F. ;
Reichenbach, P. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 7 (06) :637-650
[5]   The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan [J].
Ayalew, L ;
Yamagishi, H .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) :15-31
[6]   A comparative evaluation of heuristic and bivariate statistical modelling for landslide susceptibility mappings in Ghurmi-Dhad Khola, east Nepal [J].
Bijukchhen, Subeg Man ;
Kayastha, Prabin ;
Dhital, Megh Raj .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (08) :2727-2743
[7]   Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dholakia, M. B. .
CATENA, 2017, 149 :52-63
[8]   A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India) [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Bui, Dieu Tien ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dholakia, M. B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 84 :240-250
[9]  
Bonham-Carter G F., 1990, Geological Survey of Canada Paper, V89, P171
[10]   Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues [J].
Catani, F. ;
Lagomarsino, D. ;
Segoni, S. ;
Tofani, V. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (11) :2815-2831