Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation

被引:112
作者
Wang, Zequn [1 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Random process; Kriging; Reliability analysis; Adaptive sampling; Time-variant; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; DECOMPOSITION; SIMULATION; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Time-variant reliability measures the probability that an engineering system successfully performs intended functions over a certain period of time under various sources of uncertainty. In practice, it is computationally prohibitive to propagate uncertainty in time-variant reliability assessment based on expensive or complex numerical models. This paper presents an equivalent stochastic process transformation approach for cost-effective prediction of reliability deterioration over the life cycle of an engineering system. To reduce the high dimensionality, a time-independent reliability model is developed by translating random processes and time parameters into random parameters in order to equivalently cover all potential failures that may occur during the time interval of interest. With the time-independent reliability model, an instantaneous failure surface is attained by using a Kriging-based surrogate model to identify all potential failure events. To enhance the efficacy of failure surface identification, a maximum confidence enhancement method is utilized to update the Kriging model sequentially. Then, the time-variant reliability is approximated using Monte Carlo simulations of the Kriging model where system failures over a time interval are predicted by the instantaneous failure surface. The results of two case studies demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to accurately predict the time evolution of system reliability while requiring much less computational efforts compared with the existing analytical approach. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 175
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability [J].
Andrieu-Renaud, C ;
Sudret, B ;
Lemaire, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 84 (01) :75-86
[3]   A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis [J].
Bucher, Christian ;
Most, Thomas .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (2-3) :154-163
[4]   The extreme value distribution and dynamic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters [J].
Chen, Jlan-Bing ;
Li, Jie .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2007, 29 (02) :77-93
[5]   Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures [J].
Chojaczyk, A. A. ;
Teixeira, A. P. ;
Neves, L. C. ;
Cardoso, J. B. ;
Guedes Soares, C. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 52 :78-89
[6]   Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis [J].
Crestaux, Thierry ;
Le Maitre, Olivier ;
Martinez, Jean-Marc .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (07) :1161-1172
[7]   Simulation of highly skewed non-Gaussian stochastic processes [J].
Deodatis, G ;
Micaletti, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2001, 127 (12) :1284-1295
[8]   Ductile structural system reliability analysis using adaptive importance sampling [J].
Dey, A ;
Mahadevan, S .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1998, 20 (02) :137-154
[9]   Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis [J].
Dubourg, V. ;
Sudret, B. ;
Deheeger, F. .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2013, 33 :47-57
[10]  
Engelung S., 1995, PROBABILIST ENG MECH, V10, P53, DOI [10.1016/0266-8920(94)00008-9, DOI 10.1016/0266-8920(94)00008-9]