Effectiveness and safety of Chinese medicine combined with omeprazole in the treatment of gastric ulcer A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:22
作者
Xie, Cheng [1 ]
Liu, Langhui [2 ]
Zhu, Suyou [3 ]
Wei, Mingquan [3 ]
机构
[1] Huaibei Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Huaibei, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Chinese medicine; gastric ulcer; protocol; systematic review; BIAS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000025744
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gastric ulcer (GU) is a common digestive system disease, and the main clinical manifestations are nausea and epigastric pain. In recent years, due to increased life pressure, unhealthy eating habits and environment, the incidence of gastric ulcer has increased year by year. Because the disease has a long treatment cycle and is prone to relapse, if it cannot be controlled in time, it can cause the disease to prolong, affect the daily life and health of the patient, and even cause complications such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding, ulcer perforation, and pyloric obstruction. Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the main causes of GU. Clinically, the curative effect of western medicine or traditional Chinese medicine cannot reach the ideal level, so in recent years, the combination of traditional Chinese and western medicine has been highly praised. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Chinese medicine combined with omeprazole for GU. Methods: The data and information will be retrieved from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang data. Literature search is limited to Chinese and English. The search time range is from the establishment of the database to April 7, 2021. The search strategy uses a combination of subject terms and free words to search. In order to avoid omissions, the search scope includes subject terms, keywords, or full text. Two reviewers will independently exclude substandard articles and extract eligible data. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RevMan 5.3 will be used for systematic review and meta-analysis. This protocol will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement, and the systematic review will be reported with the PRISMA statement. Results and conclusion: The efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine combined with omeprazole for the treatment of GU will be evaluated, and the conclusion will be published to provide medical evidence for a better clinical decision of patients with GU.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Cumpston, Miranda
    Li, Tianjing
    Page, Matthew J.
    Chandler, Jacqueline
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thomas, James
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10):
  • [2] Effects of esomeprazole on healing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric ulcers in the presence of a continued NSAID treatment: Characterization of molecular mechanisms
    Fornai, Matteo
    Colucci, Rocchina
    Antonioli, Luca
    Awwad, Oriana
    Ugolini, Clara
    Tuccori, Marco
    Fulceri, Federica
    Natale, Gianfranco
    Basolo, Fulvio
    Blandizzi, Corrado
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 63 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [3] Kangwan Napapan, 2014, World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol, V5, P40, DOI 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i1.40
  • [4] Systematic Review of the Epidemiology of Complicated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Incidence, Recurrence, Risk Factors and Mortality
    Lau, James Y.
    Sung, Joseph
    Hill, Catherine
    Henderson, Catherine
    Howden, Colin W.
    Metz, David C.
    [J]. DIGESTION, 2011, 84 (02) : 102 - 113
  • [5] Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (03) : 785 - 794
  • [6] Ling Y., 2018, Clin. Study Tradit. Chin. Med., V10, P135
  • [7] Liu J., 2017, DIGEST WORLDS LATEST, V17, P176
  • [8] Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
  • [9] Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: Focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
    Savović J.
    Weeks L.
    Sterne J.A.C.
    Turner L.
    Altman D.G.
    Moher D.
    Higgins J.P.T.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [10] Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses
    Sutton, AJ
    Duval, SJ
    Tweedie, RL
    Abrams, KR
    Jones, DR
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7249): : 1574 - 1577