Analytical framework for the management of risk in supply chains

被引:103
作者
Gaonkar, Roshan S. [1 ]
Viswanadham, N.
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst, Singapore 119260, Singapore
[2] Indian Sch Business, Hyderabad 500032, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
cause-consequence diagrams; failure analysis; mean-variance optimization; partner selection; risk management; supply chain design; supply chain planning; supply chain risk management;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2006.880540
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we develop a framework to classify supply chain risk-management problems and approaches for the solution of these problems. We argue that risk-management problems need to be handled at three levels: 1) strategic, 2) operational, and 3) tactical. In addition, risk within the supply chain might manifest itself in the form of deviations, disruptions, and disasters. To handle unforeseen events in the supply chain, there are two obvious approaches: 1) to design chains with built-in risk tolerance and 2) to contain the damage once the undesirable event has occurred. Both of these approaches require a clear understanding of undesirable events that may take place in the supply chain and the associated consequences and impacts from these events. Having described these approaches, we then focus our efforts on mapping out the propagation of events in the supply chain due to supplier nonperformance, and employ our insight to develop two mathematical programming-based preventive models for strategic level deviation and disruption management. The first model, a simple integer quadratic optimization model, adapted from the Markowitz model, determines optimal partner selection with the objective of minimizing both the operational cost and the variability of total operational cost. The second model, a simple mixed integer programming optimization model, adapted from the credit risk minimization model, determines optimal partner selection such that the supply shortfall is minimized even in the face of supplier disruptions. Hence, both of these models offer possible approaches to robust supply chain design.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANAL MANUFACTURING E
[2]  
BITTNER M, 2000, AMR RES NOV
[3]  
Bourgeois JHJ, 2003, J INT ECON LAW, V6, P211, DOI 10.1093/jiel/6.1.211
[4]  
*CRANF U CRANF SCH, 2002, SUPPL CHAIN VULN 200
[5]  
FANGRUO C, 2000, MEAN VARIANCE ANAL B
[6]  
GAONKAR R, 2003, THESIS NATL U SINGAP
[7]   Design of six sigma supply chains [J].
Garg, D ;
Narahari, Y ;
Viswanadham, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 1 (01) :38-57
[8]   Risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems [J].
Grabowski, M ;
Merrick, JRW ;
Harrald, JR ;
Mazzuchi, TA ;
van Dorp, JR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2000, 30 (06) :651-660
[9]  
GRABOWSKI M, 1999, ORGANIS SCI, V10
[10]   Learning from toys: Lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry [J].
Johnson, ME .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 43 (03) :106-+