The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals

被引:14
作者
Keijzer, Elisabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO, Post Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Burial; Cremation; Environmental impacts; Funerals; LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; CONTAMINATION; LAND; SOIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Although the funeral market is propagating new 'green' alternatives and exploring innovative techniques like resomation, very little is known about the environmental impact of funerals. This research aimed to develop a benchmark of funerals, by quantifying the environmental impacts of the most common funeral techniques, i.e. burial and cremation, by identifying where the main impacts originate from and by comparing these impacts to impacts of other activities during a person's life. Methods The environmental impacts of funerals were analysed by means of a life cycle assessment (LCA), based on Dutch company information, literature and expert judgements. The results were analysed per impact category but also on an aggregated level by means of shadow prices. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: one examined the high impact of cotton in funeral coffins; the other checked the results by means of another weighting method. Results and discussion The results showed no significant difference between the two funeral techniques in five impact categories. Burial has the lowest impact in more than half of the categories, but its impact is many times higher in the two most differing categories than for cremation. The total shadow price of burial is about 30 % higher than the shadow price of cremation, but the main cause for this difference is a highly debated category, namely land use. If the results would be considered without the shadow prices of land impact categories, burial would score 25 % lower than cremation. These results are representing average practise and may deviate on certain aspects for other countries, but as a starting point for further studies, this benchmark is well applicable. Conclusions and recommendations This study delivered an environmental benchmark of funerals and insights in the impacts of the individual processes, which can be used in further assessment of 'green' funeral options. The benchmark results show that the environmental impact of funerals is largely determined by secondary processes and that the total impact can be quite small in comparison to other human activities. Besides these environmental insights, it is important to take into account social, cultural, climatic, local, economical and ethical arguments before changing policies or giving recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 730
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, QUANTIFIED ECO EFFIC, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5399-1_4
  • [2] Appelman W, 2005, BEOORDELING MILIEU E
  • [3] PCB body burdens in US women of childbearing age 2001-2002: An evaluation of alternate summary metrics of NHANES data
    Axelrad, Daniel A.
    Goodman, Stephanie
    Woodruff, Tracey J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 109 (04) : 368 - 378
  • [4] Brinkmann FJJ, 1987, 840276001 RIVM
  • [5] Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of 'fertile land' in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Canals, Llorenc Mila i
    Romanya, Joan
    Cowell, Sarah J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (15) : 1426 - 1440
  • [6] Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2003, STEEDS MIND MENS HEB
  • [7] De Bruyn S., 2010, Shadow prices handbook. valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts
  • [8] Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Brander, Luke
    van der Ploeg, Sander
    Costanza, Robert
    Bernard, Florence
    Braat, Leon
    Christie, Mike
    Crossman, Neville
    Ghermandi, Andrea
    Hein, Lars
    Hussain, Salman
    Kumar, Pushpam
    McVittie, Alistair
    Portela, Rosimeiry
    Rodriguez, Luis C.
    ten Brink, Patrick
    van Beukeringh, Pieter
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) : 50 - 61
  • [9] Review of human decomposition processes in soil
    Dent, BB
    Forbes, SL
    Stuart, BH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2004, 45 (04): : 576 - 585
  • [10] Dent BB, 1998, P INT GROUNDW C 8 13, P451