The Association of Health Reform and Infant Health: Evidence from Massachusetts

被引:7
作者
Boudreaux, Michel H. [1 ]
Dagher, Rada K. [2 ]
Lorch, Scott A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, 4200 Valley Dr,3310A, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Natl Inst Minor Hlth & Hlth Dispar, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Neonatol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Perinatal & Pediat Hlth Dispar Res, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Health insurance; health reform; infant mortality; low birthweight; CARE REFORM; INTERCONCEPTION CARE; MEDICAID EXPANSIONS; WELFARE-REFORM; PREGNANT-WOMEN; PRENATAL-CARE; COVERAGE; INSURANCE; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.12779
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo estimate whether the incidence of low birthweight and rates of infant mortality were associated with Massachusetts health reform in the overall population and for subgroups that are at higher risk for poor health outcomes. Data SourcesIndividual-level data on birthweight were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics detailed natality files, and aggregated county-level mortality rates were generated from linked birth-death files. We used restricted versions of each file that had intact state and substate geographic identifiers. Research DesignWe employed a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design. Principal ResultsWe found small and statistically nonsignificant associations between the reform and the incidence of low birthweight and infant mortality rates. Results were consistent across a number of subgroups and were robust to alternative comparison groups and alternative modeling assumptions. ConclusionsWe found no evidence that the Massachusetts reform was associated with improvements in individual low birthweights or county-level infant mortality rates, despite increasing health insurance coverage rates for adult women of child-bearing age. Because our mortality analysis was ecological, we are not able to draw conclusions about how an individual-level health insurance intervention for uninsured pregnant women would affect the mortality outcomes of their infants.
引用
收藏
页码:2406 / 2425
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, 2016, STAT SNAPSH
[2]  
Apostolava-Mihaylova M., 2017, HLTH INSURANCE FERTI
[3]   HEALTHY START Lessons Learned on Interconception Care [J].
Badura, Maribeth ;
Johnson, Kay ;
Hench, Karen ;
Reyes, Madelyn .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2008, 18 (06) :S61-S66
[4]  
Caceres I., 2016, RACIAL ETHNIC HLTH D
[5]   A Practitioner's Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference [J].
Cameron, A. Colin ;
Miller, Douglas L. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2015, 50 (02) :317-372
[6]  
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, 2015, STRONG START MOTH NE
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, VITALSTATS NAT CTR H
[8]   Does Universal Coverage Improve Health? The Massachusetts Experience [J].
Courtemanche, Charles J. ;
Zapata, Daniela .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (01) :36-U313
[9]   Saving babies: The efficacy and cost of recent changes in the Medicaid eligibility of pregnant women [J].
Currie, J ;
Gruber, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (06) :1263-1296
[10]   Medicaid expansions and welfare contractions: offsetting effects on prenatal care and infant health? [J].
Currie, J ;
Grogger, J .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :313-335