A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different control valves on the dynamic performance of a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

被引:29
作者
Bian, Xingyan [1 ]
Wang, Xuan [1 ]
Wang, Rui [1 ]
Cai, Jinwen [1 ]
Tian, Hua [1 ]
Shu, Gequn [2 ]
Lin, Zhimin [3 ]
Yu, Xiangyu [3 ]
Shi, Lingfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Engines, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Thermal Sci & Energy Engn, Hefei 230027, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Marine Diesel Engine Res Inst, 400 Newtonian Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Recompression supercritical CO 2 Brayton; cycle; Dynamic performance; Control valve; Comprehensive evaluation; CARBON-DIOXIDE; DESIGN; ENGINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.123630
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle (SCBC) is regarded as one of the most promising power cycles due to its compactness and high efficiency. Considering the safe operation and the rapidly load tracking, the valve control is used to investigate the dynamic performance of the SCBC. Therefore, this paper establishes a dynamic model of a recompression SCBC and puts forwards five kinds of control valves to investigate and compare the influence of different control valves on the open-loop dynamic performance of the system from the thermodynamic response characteristics and the safety performance evaluation. The simulation results indicate that the turbine bypass valve and the HTR bypass valve have a better load regulation capability compared with the other valves: load rates of 40.87% and 52.33% can be achieved when the valve opening is reduced to 50%, respectively. Besides, the two valves allow for timely tracking and maintain safe system operation simultaneously with up to two additional controllers. Moreover, the system under the turbine bypass valve control has the fastest response compared with that under the control of turbine throttle valve and HTR bypass valve. (C)& nbsp;2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    Ahn, Yoonhan
    Bae, Seong Jun
    Kim, Minseok
    Cho, Seong Kuk
    Baik, Seungjoon
    Lee, Jeong Ik
    Cha, Jae Eun
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 647 - 661
  • [2] Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop
    Ahn, Yoonhan
    Lee, Jekyoung
    Kim, Seong Gu
    Lee, Jeong Ik
    Cha, Jae Eun
    Lee, Si-Woo
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 86 : 115 - 127
  • [3] Avadhanula VK, 2017, TURBO EXPO POWER LAN, P50961
  • [4] Carstens Nathan, 2007, Control strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide power conversion systems
  • [5] Cha JE, 2014, SUP CO2 POW CYCL S 2
  • [6] Cha JE, 2016, P 5 INT S SUP CO2 PO, P28
  • [7] Clementoni EM, 2017, P ASME TURB EXP 2017, P26
  • [8] Comparative study of the supercritical carbon-dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with different control strategies
    Ding, Hao
    Zhang, Yaoli
    Hong, Gang
    Li, Jun
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 137 (137)
  • [9] Development of a bypass control strategy for supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle cooled reactor system under load-following operation
    Gao, Chuntian
    Wu, Pan
    Liu, Weihua
    Ma, Yunduo
    Shan, Jianqiang
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 151
  • [10] Hartnett J.P., 1998, ADV HEAT TRANSFER