Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients

被引:63
作者
Chua, Ivan Tjun Huat [1 ]
Rajamoney, Ganesan Naidu [1 ]
Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
关键词
fracture fixation; intramedullary; hip fractures; treatment outcome; MOBILITY SCORE; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; ANTIROTATION; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1177/230949901302100309
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. To compare the short-term ambulatory function of elderly patients after fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with either the AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device or the dynamic hip screw (DHS). Methods. 63 patients aged >= 60 years underwent fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO types A2 and A3) using the PFNA (n=25) or DHS (n=38). The decision for the type of implant used was based on the lead surgeon's preference, according to perceived fracture stability and clinical experience. In patients having PFNA fixation, weight bearing ambulation and rehabilitation was commenced on day 2. The extent of weight bearing was decided by the lead surgeon based on the stability of the fracture. In patients having DHS fixation, non-weight bearing and ambulation with a walking aid was commenced on day 2. Ambulatory function before injury and after surgery was measured using the Parker Mobility Score (PMS). The 2 groups were compared in terms of the PMS, ambulatory independence, and environmental mobility. Results. Respectively in PFNA and DHS patients, 32% and 13% (p=0.035) were ambulant with a walking frame at discharge; the remainder were wheelchair bound. Patients treated with PFNA had significantly higher median PMS at 6 months (4 vs. 2, p=0.002), median ambulatory independence score at 6 months (4 vs. 3, p=0.004) and at 12 months (5 vs. 4, p=0.001), and median environmental mobility score at 6 months (2 vs. 1, p=0.007). They also had significantly higher percentage of patients able to ambulate outdoor and in community at 6 months (64% vs. 29%, p=0.02) and able to walk independently or with a walking aid at 12 months (96% vs. 69%, p=0.01). There were 3 complications. Two patients treated with PFNA had blade cut-out, owing to poor fracture reduction. One patient treated with DHS had screw cut-out and subsequently developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Conclusion. Unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with good pre-fracture ambulatory function stabilised with the PFNA resulted in better short-term ambulatory function.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 312
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) [J].
Liu, Yake ;
Tao, Ran ;
Liu, Fan ;
Wang, Youhua ;
Zhou, Zhenyu ;
Cao, Yi ;
Wang, Hong .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2010, 41 (08) :810-817
[12]   The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures [J].
Mereddy, Praveen ;
Kamath, Sri ;
Ramakrishnan, Muthukrishnan ;
Malik, Hamad ;
Donnachie, Nigel .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (04) :428-432
[13]   Hip fractures in nonagenarians - a study on operative and non-operative management [J].
Ooi, LH ;
Wong, TH ;
Toh, CL ;
Wong, HP .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (01) :142-147
[14]   Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF 600 FRACTURES [J].
Parker, M. J. ;
Bowers, T. R. ;
Pryor, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (03) :391-397
[15]  
Parker M. J., 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V3, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.PUB5/ABSTRACT
[16]   Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults [J].
Parker, Martyn J. ;
Handoll, Helen H. G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (09)
[17]   A NEW MOBILITY SCORE FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY AFTER HIP FRACTURE [J].
PARKER, MJ ;
PALMER, CR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05) :797-798
[18]   Pertrochanteric fractures:: Is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail [J].
Saudan, M ;
Lübbeke, A ;
Sadowski, C ;
Riand, N ;
Stern, R ;
Hoffmeyer, P .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2002, 16 (06) :386-393
[19]   The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA®) in daily practice:: Results of a multicentre clinical study [J].
Simmermacher, R. K. J. ;
Ljungqvist, J. ;
Bail, H. ;
Hockertz, T. ;
Vochteloo, A. J. H. ;
Ochs, U. ;
v. d. Werken, Chr. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2008, 39 (08) :932-939
[20]   The influence of cognitive function on outcome after a hip fracture [J].
Soderqvist, Anita ;
Miedel, Ricard ;
Ponzer, Sari ;
Tidermark, Jan .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (10) :2115-2123