Architecting the Future of Weather Satellites

被引：13

作者：

Maier, Mark W. ^{[1
]}

Gallagher, Frank W. ^{[2
]}

St Germain, Karen ^{[3
]}

Anthes, Richard ^{[4
]}

Zuffada, Cinzia ^{[5
]}

Menzies, Robert ^{[5
]}

Piepmeier, Jeffrey ^{[6
]}

Di Pietro, David ^{[6
]}

Coakley, Monica M. ^{[7
]}

Adams, Elena ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Aerosp Corp, Chantilly, VA 20151 USA

[2] NOAA, NESDIS, OSAAP, Silver Spring, MD USA

[3] NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC USA

[4] Univ Corp Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO USA

[5] CALTECH, NASA, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA

[6] NASA, GSFC, Greenbelt, MD USA

[7] MIT, Lincoln Lab, 244 Wood St, Lexington, MA 02173 USA

[8] JHU APL, Laurel, MD USA

来源：

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2021年 / 102卷 / 03期

关键词：

Remote sensing; Satellite observations; Sensitivity studies;

D O I：

10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0258.1

中图分类号：

P4 [大气科学（气象学）];

学科分类号：

0706 ; 070601 ;

摘要：

Between 2014 and 2018, the NOAA Office of Systems Architecture and Advanced Planning (OSAAP) conducted the NOAA Satellite Observing System Architecture (NSOSA) study to plan the long-term future of the NOAA constellation of operational environmental satellites. This constellation of satellites (which may include space capabilities acquired in lieu of U.S. government satellites) will follow the current GOES-R and JPSS satellite programs, beginning about 2030. This was an opportunity to design a modern architecture with no preconceived notions regarding instruments, platforms, orbits, etc., but driven by user needs, new technology, and exploiting emerging space business models. In this paper we describe how the study was structured, review major results, show how observation priorities and estimated costs drove next-generation choices, and discuss important challenges for implementing the next generation of U.S. civil environmental remote sensing satellites.

引用

页码：E589 / E610

页数：22

共 50 条

[21] Areosynchronous Weather Imager
Puschell, Jeffery J.
Lock, Robert
REMOTE SENSING SYSTEM ENGINEERING VI, 2016, 9977
[22] Anthropogenic Space Weather
Gombosi, T. I.
Baker, D. N.
Balogh, A.
Erickson, P. J.
Huba, J. D.
Lanzerotti, L. J.
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2017, 212 (3-4) : 985 - 1039
[23] The combined impact of future space-based atmospheric sounding instruments on numerical weather-prediction analysis fields: A simulation study
Collard, AD
Healy, SB
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 129 (593) : 2741 - 2760
[24] Monitor Forest Fires with FY Serial Satellites
YAO Shuren WANG Mingyu SHU Lifu TIAN Xiaorui LI JieInstitute of Forest Protection. Chinese Academy of Forestryfire @forestry
Chinese Forestry Science and Technology, 2003, (03) : 73 - 78
[25] Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites
Wolfgang Wagner
Vahid Naeimi
Klaus Scipal
Richard de Jeu
José Martínez-Fernández
Hydrogeology Journal, 2007, 15 : 121 - 131
[26] Earth Observation by Distributed Networks of Small Satellites
Schilling, Klaus
ICICI-BME: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION, COMMUNICATION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, : 397 - 399
[27] Building a world web [environment monitoring satellites]
Edwards, Christian
Engineering and Technology, 2007, 2 (04) : 36 - 40
[28] Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites
Wagner, Wolfgang
Naeimi, Vahid
Scipal, Klaus
de Jeu, Richard
Martinez-Fernandez, Jose
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 15 (01) : 121 - 131
[29] Atmospheric Observations of Weather and Climate
Bluestein, Howard B.
Carr, Frederick H.
Goodman, Steven J.
ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2022, 60 (3-4) : 149 - 187
[30] Weather reacting to geomagnetic storms
Illés-Almár, E
SOLAR VARIABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2004, 34 (02): : 376 - 378

← 1 2 3 4 5 →