The Effects of Focal and Nonfocal Cues on the Neural Correlates of Prospective Memory: Insights From ERPs

被引:43
作者
Cona, Giorgia [1 ]
Bisiacchi, Patrizia S. [1 ]
Moscovitch, Morris [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
cue focality; delayed intentions; ERPs; prospective memory; strategic monitoring; TASK INTERFERENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MULTIPLE PROCESSES; BRAIN POTENTIALS; CATEGORY NORMS; RETRIEVAL; INTENTIONS; RECOGNITION; ACTIVATION; COST;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bht116
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study is the first designed to investigate behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) correlates of the processes involved in focal and nonfocal prospective memory (PM) tasks. Focal tasks are those in which the features of the PM cue are easily extracted from the ongoing activity, whereas the process is more indirect in nonfocal tasks. Strategic monitoring was associated with a slowing of reaction times in ongoing trials and with frontal and parietal ERP modulations. These effects were greater in the nonfocal task, whereas they were smaller, or even absent for some individuals, in the focal task. This indicates that strategic monitoring is engaged to a greater extent in nonfocal tasks, whereas it is less extensively recruited, or not recruited at all by some individuals, in focal tasks. Indeed, the recognition of the PM cue might also occur automatically in focal tasks, as suggested by the FN400 increase in focal PM trials. Nonfocal tasks are supported by more controlled resources not only in retrieval, but also in postretrieval monitoring and coordinating processes. This was reflected in the enhancement of the prospective positivity and frontal slow wave observed in nonfocal PM trials. We interpreted these results as supporting the multiprocess view of PM.
引用
收藏
页码:2630 / 2646
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Differences in target monitoring in a prospective memory task [J].
Albinski, Rafal ;
Sedek, Grzegorz ;
Kliegel, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 24 (08) :916-928
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field
[3]   CATEGORY NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 56 CATEGORIES - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION OF CONNECTICUT CATEGORY NORMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
MONTAGUE, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P2) :1-&
[4]   Modulation of a fronto-parietal network in event-based prospective memory: An rTMS study [J].
Bisiacchi, P. S. ;
Cona, G. ;
Schiff, S. ;
Basso, D. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (08) :2225-2232
[5]   The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates [J].
Bisiacchi, Patrizia S. ;
Schiff, Sami ;
Ciccola, Alessia ;
Kliegel, Matthias .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (05) :1362-1373
[6]  
Brandimonte M., 1996, PROSPECTIVE MEMORY T
[7]   Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval [J].
Breneiser, Jennifer E. ;
McDaniel, Mark A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (05) :837-841
[8]   Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection [J].
Brewer, Gene A. ;
Knight, Justin B. ;
Marsh, Richard L. ;
Unsworth, Nash .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (03) :304-311
[9]  
Burgess P.W., 1997, COGNITIVE MODELS MEM, P247
[10]   Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far? [J].
Burgess, Paul W. ;
Gonen-Yaacovi, Gil ;
Volle, Emmanuelle .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (08) :2246-2257