Analysis of depth-sectioning STEM for thick samples and 3D imaging

被引:33
作者
Bosch, Eric G. T. [1 ]
Lazic, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Thermo Fisher Sci, Achtseweg,Noord 5, NL-5651 GG Eindhoven, Noord Brabant, Netherlands
关键词
STEM; Depth sectioning STEM; Thick samples; 3D imaging; iDPC-STEM; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY; S-STATE MODEL; TOMOGRAPHY; RESOLUTION; CONTRAST; ATOMS; RECONSTRUCTION; PROSPECTS; CRYSTALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112831
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
We derive a model that describes 3D volume imaging in depth-sectioning STEM that is valid for all STEM techniques under three well-defined conditions: linearity, undisturbed probe and elastic scattering. The resulting undisturbed probe model generalizes the widely used idea that the undisturbed probe intensity in three dimensions can be used as the point spread function for depth-sectioning ADF-STEM to all STEM techniques including (A)BF- and iDPC-STEM. The model provides closed expressions for depth-sectioning STEM, which follow directly from the 2D expressions for thin samples, and thereby enables analysis of the 3D resolution. Using the model we explore the consequences of the resulting 3D contrast transfer function (CTF) for the z-resolution at different length scales and illustrate this with experiments. We investigate the validity and limitations of the model using multi-slice simulations showing that it is valid and quantitatively accurate for relatively thick amorphous samples but not for crystalline samples in zone-axis due to channeling. We compare depth-sectioning in iDPC and ADF-STEM and show that iDPC-STEM can extract information from deeper into the sample, all the way fill the bottom of the sample, thereby effectively allowing a thickness measurement. Also the difference in optimal focus conditions between iDPC- and ADF-STEM is explained. Finally, we propose practical criteria for deciding whether a sample is thin or thick.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] The S-state model: a work horse for HRTEM
    Geuens, P
    Van Dyck, D
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2002, 93 (3-4) : 179 - 198
  • [22] Strain Mapping of Two-Dimensional Heterostructures with Subpicometer Precision
    Han, Yimo
    Nguyen, Kayla
    Cao, Michael
    Cueva, Paul
    Xie, Saien
    Tate, Mark W.
    Purohit, Prafull
    Gruner, Sol M.
    Park, Jiwoong
    Muller, David A.
    [J]. NANO LETTERS, 2018, 18 (06) : 3746 - 3751
  • [23] Three-Dimensional Optical Sectioning by Scanning Confocal Electron Microscopy with a Stage-Scanning System
    Hashimoto, Ayako
    Shimojo, Masayuki
    Mitsuishi, Kazutaka
    Takeguchi, Masaki
    [J]. MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2010, 16 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [24] Analytic derivation of optimal imaging conditions for incoherent imaging in aberration-corrected electron microscopes
    Intaraprasonk, Varat
    Xin, Huolin L.
    Muller, David A.
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2008, 108 (11) : 1454 - 1466
  • [25] Refinement of Monte Carlo simulations of electron-specimen interaction in low-voltage SEM
    Kieft, Erik
    Bosch, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2008, 41 (21)
  • [26] Recent advances in electron tomography:: TEM and HAADF-STEM tomography for materials science and semiconductor applications
    Kübel, C
    Voigt, A
    Schoenmakers, R
    Otten, M
    Su, D
    Lee, TC
    Carlsson, A
    Bradley, J
    [J]. MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2005, 11 (05) : 378 - 400
  • [27] Lazic I, 2017, ADV IMAG ELECT PHYS, V199, P75, DOI 10.1016/bs.aiep.2017.01.006
  • [28] Phase contrast STEM for thin samples: Integrated differential phase contrast
    Lazic, Ivan
    Bosch, Eric G. T.
    Lazar, Sorin
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2016, 160 : 265 - 280
  • [29] 3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: the development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography
    Midgley, PA
    Weyland, M
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2003, 96 (3-4) : 413 - 431
  • [30] Imaging modes for scanning confocal electron microscopy in a double aberration-corrected transmission electron microscope
    Nellist, P. D.
    Cosgriff, E. C.
    Behan, G.
    Kirkland, A. I.
    [J]. MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2008, 14 (01) : 82 - 88