Effects of EFL Learners' L2 Writing Self-efficacy on Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback

被引:30
作者
Tsao, Jui-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Appl English, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Learner engagement; Writing self-efficacy; Written corrective feedback; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research has indicated the integral role of self-efficacy in boosting learner engagement. Yet, little research on this issue has been conducted in the field of L2 writing. The purpose of this quantitative study is to explore how EFL learners' L2 writing self-efficacy affects the level of their engagement with teacher and peer written corrective feedback (WCF). A sample comprising 227 Taiwanese senior high school students completed two questionnaires: the learner engagement with written corrective feedback scale and the L2 learners' writing self-efficacy scale. The results showed that the participants self-reported a low-to-moderate level of L2 writing self-efficacy. In addition, when all three subtypes (i.e., ideation, conventions, and self-regulation) of L2 writing self-efficacy were taken into account, self-efficacy for writing self-regulation was the only variable with predictive power for learner engagement with teacher and peer written corrective feedback. The findings further our understanding of EFL learners' L2 writing self-efficacy and of the under-researched topic of the relationship between L2 writing self-efficacy and learner engagement with written corrective feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 584
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Physically Isolated but Socially Connected: Psychological Adjustment and Stress Among Adolescents During the Initial COVID-19 Crisis
    Ellis, Wendy E.
    Dumas, Tara M.
    Forbes, Lindsey M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2020, 52 (03): : 177 - 187
  • [12] George D., 2001, SPSS for Windows: A Simple Guide and Reference 10.0 Update, V3
  • [13] Gimenes L, 2020, BROWN DAILY HER 1109
  • [14] Hedgcock J., 1994, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V3, P141, DOI [10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4, DOI 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4]
  • [15] Horbacauskiene J., 2015, EXPLORATIONS ENGLISH, V3, P70, DOI 10.1515/exell-2017-0002
  • [16] Kavanoz S., 2016, International Online Journal Of Educational Sciences, V8, P71, DOI [10.15345/iojes.2016.02.007, DOI 10.15345/IOJES.2016.02.007]
  • [17] A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention
    Kim, Young Hoon
    Kim, Dan J.
    Wachter, Kathy
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2013, 56 : 361 - 370
  • [18] Kirmizi O., 2015, International Journal Of Higher Education, V4, P57
  • [19] Kline R. B., 2016, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, V4th
  • [20] Lilienfeld S., 2015, ENCY CLIN PSYCHOL