A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:79
作者
Peterson, Jennifer [1 ]
Sodhi, Nipun [1 ]
Khlopas, Anton [1 ]
Piuzzi, Nicolas S. [1 ]
Newman, Jared M. [2 ]
Sultan, Assem A. [1 ]
Stearns, Kim L. [1 ]
Mont, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 9500 Euclid Ave,A40, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
关键词
relative value units; total knee arthroplasty; compensation; physician reimbursement; cost analysis; TIME; COMPLEXITY; CORRELATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.070
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), revision cases are often technically more challenging, and require more operative time and aftercare than primary cases. These time and effort differences should therefore be appropriately compensated for when using the relative value unit (RVU) system. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the mean (1) RVUs; (2) operative times; and (3) RVU/min; and (4) perform an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference analysis for primary vs revision TKA. Methods: Current Procedural Terminology code 27447 identified 165,439 primary TKA patients, while Current Procedural Terminology code 27487 identified 8081 revision TKA patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The mean RVUs, operative times, and RVU/min were calculated. Dollar amount per minute, per case, per day, and year were also calculated. Student's t-test, with a cut-off P-value of <.05, was used in order to identify any statistical differences in mean RVUs, operative times, and RVU/min. Results: The mean RVUs for primary TKA was 22, while for revision TKA was 27 (P < .001). The mean operative time for primary TKA was 94 minutes, while for revision TKA was 149 minutes (P < .001). The mean RVU/min for primary TKA was 0.26, while for revision TKA was 0.22 (P < .001). The dollar amounts calculated for primary vs revision TKA were per minute ($9.33 vs $7.90), per case ($877.12 vs $1176.43), per day ($4385.60 vs $3529), and projected a $137,008.70 annual cost difference. Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons are reimbursed at a higher rate per minute for primary cases compared to revision TKA (0.26 vs 0.22, P < .001). The annual difference can amount to nearly $140,000. Orthopedic surgeons can use this information to better understand the dynamics of their time, compensation, and ultimately, their practice. Furthermore, it can be argued that there needs to be a shift to increase the RVU per unit time for revision TKAs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S39 / S42
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM COLL SURG NAT SUR
[2]   Pediatric Echocardiography by Work Relative Value Units: Is Study Complexity Adequately Captured? [J].
Balasubramanian, Sowmya ;
Kipps, Alaina K. ;
Smith, Shea N. ;
Tacy, Theresa A. ;
Tierney, Elif Seda Selamet .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2016, 29 (11) :1084-1091
[3]   The role of physicians and medical organizations in the development, analysis, and implementation of health care policy [J].
Beyer, David C. ;
Mohideen, Najeeb .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) :186-193
[4]   Quantifying and Predicting Surgeon Work Effort for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bunn, Kevin J. ;
Isaacson, Mark J. ;
Ismaily, Sabir K. ;
Noble, Philip C. ;
Incavo, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09) :S59-S62
[5]  
Iorio R, 1999, ORTHOPEDICS, V22, P195
[6]   How Is Physician Work Valued? [J].
Jacobs, Jeffrey P. ;
Lahey, Stephen J. ;
Nichols, Francis C. ;
Levett, James M. ;
Johnston, George Gilbert ;
Freeman, Richard K. ;
Louis, James D. St. ;
Painter, Julie ;
Yohe, Courtney ;
Wright, Cameron D. ;
Kanter, Kirk R. ;
Mayer, John E., Jr. ;
Naunheim, Keith S. ;
Rich, Jeffrey B. ;
Bavaria, Joseph E. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 103 (02) :373-380
[7]   Relative value units correlate with pediatric surgeons' operating time: when perceived myth becomes reality [J].
Little, DC ;
St Peter, SD ;
Calkins, CM ;
Shah, SR ;
Murphy, JP ;
Gatti, JM ;
Gittes, GK ;
Sharp, RJ ;
Andrews, WS ;
Holcomb, GW ;
Ostlie, DJ ;
Snyder, CL .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2006, 41 (01) :234-237
[8]   Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT (R) Code 27279 [J].
Lorio, Morgan ;
Martinson, Melissa ;
Ferrara, Lisa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
[9]  
Ritter MA, 1996, ORTHOPEDICS, V19, P137
[10]   Does relative value unit-based compensation shortchange the acute care surgeon? [J].
Schwartz, Diane A. ;
Hui, Xuan ;
Velopulos, Catherine G. ;
Schneider, Eric B. ;
Selvarajah, Shalini ;
Lucas, Donald ;
Haut, Elliott R. ;
McQuay, Nathaniel ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. ;
Efron, David T. ;
Haider, Adil H. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 76 (01) :84-92