Tracking embodied carbon flows in the Belt and Road regions

被引:70
作者
Han Mengyao [1 ,2 ]
Yao Qiuhui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu Weidong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dunford, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MRIO; embodied carbon transfers; consumption-based carbon emission; Belt and Road Initiative; inclusive globalization; NORTH-SOUTH TRADE; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CHINA BELT; UNEVEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-018-1524-7
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In the past few decades, economic globalization has driven rapid growth of cross-border trade and a new international division of labor, leading to increasing inter- country embodied carbon flows. Multi-region input-output (MRIO) analysis is used to identify embodied carbon flows between major world regions, including seven regions along the Belt and Road (BR), and the spatial distribution of production- and consumption-based carbon intensities. The results show that current embodied carbon flows are virtually all from BR regions to developed countries, with more than 95% of world net embodied carbon exports coming from BR regions. Consumption in the United States and European Union countries induce about 30% of the carbon emissions in most BR regions, indicating that the former bear a high proportion of consumers' responsibility for the carbon emitted in the latter. For this reason, measuring environmental responsibilities from consumption rather than a production- based perspective is more equitable, while developing countries should be given a louder voice in the construction through dialogue and cooperation, in part in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative, of an inclusive global climate governance system.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1274
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ahmad N, 2003, OECD, V25, P1, DOI [10.1787/18151965, DOI 10.1787/18151965]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, VISION ACTIONS JOINT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 5 IPCC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators
[5]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[6]   Global supply chain of arable land use: Production-based and consumption-based trade imbalance [J].
Chen, G. Q. ;
Han, M. Y. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 49 :118-130
[7]  
CHICHILNISKY G, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P851
[8]   NORTH-SOUTH TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
COPELAND, BR ;
TAYLOR, MS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (03) :755-787
[9]   Trade, growth, and the environment [J].
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-71
[10]   Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Caldeira, Ken .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (12) :5687-5692