Signal Loss During Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes Between 28 and 42 Weeks of Pregnancy

被引:9
|
作者
Fuchs, Tomasz [1 ]
Pomorski, Michal [1 ]
Grobelak, Krzysztof [1 ]
Tomialowicz, Marek [1 ]
Zimmer, Mariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept & Clin Gynaecol Obstet & Neonatol 2, PL-50556 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
关键词
non-invasive fetal electrocardiography; fetal heart rate monitoring; abdominal fetal electrocardiography; signal loss in abdominal fetal electrocardiography; CARDIAC TIME INTERVALS; ULTRASOUND; QUALITY; LABOR; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.17219/acem/37258
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background. Fetal electrocardiography is one of the methods for monitoring the well-being of the fetus. Signal loss limits the proper interpretation of electrocardiogram traces. Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the average signal loss in non-invasive abdominal fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) monitoring using the KOMPOREL fetal monitoring system (ITAM, Zabrze, Poland) in women between 28 and 42 week of pregnancy. The results were compared to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetric) and DGGG (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe e.V.) recommendations concerning fetal heart monitoring. The correlation between fetal ECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was evaluated. Material and Methods. 773 pregnant women, hospitalized and diagnosed in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, underwent 30 min of abdominal fECG recordings using the KOMPOREL fetal monitoring system. Results. The average signal loss in abdominal fECG monitoring in the study group was 32%. FIGO recommendations describe an acceptable fetal signal loss of 20%. In our study, 46% (357/773) of the recordings were up to FIGO standards, with fetal heart rate success rates above 80%. According to DGGG guidelines, with acceptable fetal signal loss of 15%, only 39% (303/773) of the recordings could be assessed as accurate. No correlation between fECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was proved. Conclusions. The average signal loss in abdominal fECG monitoring in our study group was 32%. Low fECG signal quality may constitute a potentially limiting factor of the described fetal heart monitoring system. No relationship between fECG signal quality, week of pregnancy and patient BMI was proved.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 819
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes
    Cohen, Wayne R.
    Ommani, Sophia
    Hassan, Sarmina
    Mirza, Fadi G.
    Solomon, Molham
    Brown, Raymond
    Schifrin, Barry S.
    Himsworth, John M.
    Hayes-Gill, Barrie R.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (11) : 1306 - 1313
  • [2] Comment on the article "Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes"
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Pomorski, Michal
    Grobelak, Krzysztof
    Tomialowicz, Marek
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (08) : 992 - 992
  • [3] Performance of a Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrode System for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring from 34 to 37 Weeks.
    Gonzalez, Maritza G.
    Hill, Meghan G.
    Mohammadi, Raheleh
    Hosseini, Pegah T.
    Cohen, Wayne R.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 26 : 67A - 68A
  • [4] Performance of a Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrode System for Fetal Heart Rate and Uterine Contraction Monitoring from 34 to 37 Weeks
    Gonzalez, Maritza
    Hill, Meghan
    Cohen, Wayne R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (03) : 263 - 269
  • [5] CHANGES IN FETAL AND MATERNAL HEART-RATE DURING ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY IN LATE PREGNANCY
    EDWARDS, RP
    CARDOZO, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1976, 83 (08): : 628 - 630
  • [6] A New Method to Derive Fetal Heart Rate from Maternal Abdominal Electrocardiogram: Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Cesarean Section
    Yeh, Huei-Ming
    Chang, Yi-Chung
    Lin, Chen
    Yeh, Chien-Hung
    Lee, Chien-Nan
    Shyu, Ming-Kwang
    Hung, Ming-Hui
    Hsiao, Po-Ni
    Wang, Yung-Hung
    Tseng, Yu-Hsin
    Tsao, Jenho
    Lai, Ling-Ping
    Lin, Lian-Yu
    Lo, Men-Tzung
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [7] THE FEASIBILITY OF LONG-TERM FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING IN THE HOME-ENVIRONMENT USING MATERNAL ABDOMINAL ELECTRODES
    CROWE, JA
    HARRISON, A
    HAYESGILL, BR
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1995, 16 (03) : 195 - 202
  • [8] Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes in Third Trimester: Can We Obtain Additional Information Other than CTG Trace?
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Grobelak, Krzysztof
    Pomorski, Michal
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 25 (02): : 309 - 316
  • [9] FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING USING THE ABDOMINAL FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM
    CARTER, MC
    GUNN, P
    BEARD, RW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (05): : 396 - 401
  • [10] Towards fetal heart rate monitoring at home using the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram
    Crowe, JA
    Hayes-Gill, BR
    James, DK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 47 - 48