Lack of transparency and social participation undermine the fight against deforestation in Brazil

被引:0
作者
Carvalho, Raquel [1 ]
Coelho-Junior, Marcondes G. [1 ,2 ]
Valdiones, Ana Paula [1 ]
Silgueiro, Vinicius [1 ]
Thuault, Alice [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ctr Vida ICV, BR-78043405 Cuiaba, MT, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro UFRRJ, Inst Florestas, BR-23897000 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
来源
ERDE | 2022年 / 153卷 / 01期
关键词
Amazon; data transparency; social participation; deforestation; environmental justice;
D O I
10.12854/erde-2022-605
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The Brazilian government wrapped up 2021 with a masquerade at COP26 (26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties): hiding PRODES (the annual Amazon deforestation report). After three years of denying and dismantling the public apparatus to fight Amazon deforestation, this is emblematic of how transparency and social participation have been neglected. Transparency of PRODES has been crucial to all initiatives against deforestation. Notwithstanding, the Brazilian government has not only worked to discredit PRODES, but limited access to other environmental data and decreed a 'gag law'. Responses to requests of public data are largely unsatisfactory and information on deforestation permits (key to understanding the extent of legal and illegal deforestation) is either missing or incomplete. Social participation has been strongly limited after one-fifth of 22 national boards monitoring the public administration was extinct and almost half restructured. As an outcome, the Amazon Fund, the most important source of financial support against deforestation, was frozen. These systemic problems compromise the political struggle to combat Amazon deforestation and worsen the living conditions of those peoples protecting forests. Increasing transparency of environmental data through robust and reliable mechanisms, and ensuring social participation in the decision-making processes are crucial to halt deforestation and support Brazil's role as an international player.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts
    Abessa, Denis
    Fama, Ana
    Buruaem, Lucas
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 3 (04) : 510 - 511
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, INDEPENDENT
  • [3] CGU (Controladoria-Geral da Uniao), 2020, 2021 REL AP 972228
  • [4] Unmasking the impunity of illegal deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: a call for enforcement and accountability
    Coelho-Junior, Marcondes G.
    Valdiones, Ana P.
    Shimbo, Julia Z.
    Silgueiro, Vinicius
    Rosa, Marcos
    Marques, Carolina Del Lama
    Oliveira, Magaly
    Araujo, Suely
    Azevedo, Tasso
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (04)
  • [5] Brazil's deception threatens climate goals
    Ferrante, Lucas
    Fearnside, Philip M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 374 (6575) : 1569 - 1569
  • [6] Brazil's new president and 'ruralists' threaten Amazonia's environment, traditional peoples and the global climate Comment
    Ferrante, Lucas
    Fearnside, Philip M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 46 (04) : 261 - 263
  • [7] INPE (National Institute for Space Research), 2021 PORT TERRABRASI
  • [8] Lopes C. L., 2021, CLIMATE POLICY INITI
  • [9] Lopes Cristina Leme, 2021, CONCILIACAO AMBIENTA
  • [10] Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains
    Nepstad, Daniel
    McGrath, David
    Stickler, Claudia
    Alencar, Ane
    Azevedo, Andrea
    Swette, Briana
    Bezerra, Tathiana
    DiGiano, Maria
    Shimada, Joao
    da Motta, Ronaldo Seroa
    Armijo, Eric
    Castello, Leandro
    Brando, Paulo
    Hansen, Matt C.
    McGrath-Horn, Max
    Carvalho, Oswaldo
    Hess, Laura
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6188) : 1118 - 1123