Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter

被引:251
作者
Spens, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Alice R. [1 ]
Halfmaerten, David [3 ]
Knudsen, Steen W. [1 ]
Sengupta, Mita E. [4 ]
Mak, Sarah S. T. [1 ]
Sigsgaard, Eva E. [1 ]
Hellstrom, Micaela [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr GeoGenet, Oster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Wildlife Fish & Environm Studies, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[3] Res Inst Nat & Forest, Gaverstr 4, B-9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium
[4] Dept Vet Dis Biol Parasitol & Aquat Dis, Dyrlaegevej 100, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Stockholm Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Plant Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2017年 / 8卷 / 05期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
capsule; eDNA capture; environmental DNA; extraction; filter; monitoring; quantitative PCR; species-specific detection; water sampling method; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA SURVEILLANCE; ROOM-TEMPERATURE PRESERVATION; REAL-TIME PCR; WATER SAMPLES; FISH; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.12683
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aqueous environmental DNA (eDNA) is an emerging efficient non-invasive tool for species inventory studies. To maximize performance of downstream quantitative PCR (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) applications, quality and quantity of the starting material is crucial, calling for optimized capture, storage and extraction techniques of eDNA. Previous comparative studies for eDNA capture/storage have tested precipitation and open' filters. However, practical enclosed' filters which reduce unnecessary handling have not been included. Here, we fill this gap by comparing a filter capsule (Sterivex-GP polyethersulfone, pore size 022m, hereafter called SX) with commonly used methods. Our experimental set-up, covering altogether 41 treatments combining capture by precipitation or filtration with different preservation techniques and storage times, sampled one single lake (and a fish-free control pond). We selected documented capture methods that have successfully targeted a wide range of fauna. The eDNA was extracted using an optimized protocol modified from the DNeasy((R)) Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen). We measured total eDNA concentrations and Cq-values (cycles used for DNA quantification by qPCR) to target specific mtDNA cytochrome b (cyt b) sequences in two local keystone fish species. SX yielded higher amounts of total eDNA along with lower Cq-values than polycarbonate track-etched filters (PCTE), glass fibre filters (GF) or ethanol precipitation (EP). SX also generated lower Cq-values than cellulose nitrate filters (CN) for one of the target species. DNA integrity of SX samples did not decrease significantly after 2weeks of storage in contrast to GF and PCTE. Adding preservative before storage improved SX results. In conclusion, we recommend SX filters (originally designed for filtering micro-organisms) as an efficient capture method for sampling macrobial eDNA. Ethanol or Longmire's buffer preservation of SX immediately after filtration is recommended. Preserved SX capsules may be stored at room temperature for at least 2weeks without significant degradation. Reduced handling and less exposure to outside stress compared with other filters may contribute to better eDNA results. SX capsules are easily transported and enable eDNA sampling in remote and harsh field conditions as samples can be filtered/preserved on site.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 645
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms [J].
Goldberg, Caren S. ;
Strickler, Katherine M. ;
Pilliod, David S. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 183 :1-3
[12]   EXCREMENT ANALYSIS BY PCR [J].
HOSS, M ;
KOHN, M ;
PAABO, S ;
KNAUER, F ;
SCHRODER, W .
NATURE, 1992, 359 (6392) :199-199
[13]  
IBM Corp, 2020, IBM SPSS statistics for Windows
[14]   Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams [J].
Jane, Stephen F. ;
Wilcox, Taylor M. ;
McKelvey, Kevin S. ;
Young, Michael K. ;
Schwartz, Michael K. ;
Lowe, Winsor H. ;
Letcher, Benjamin H. ;
Whiteley, Andrew R. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2015, 15 (01) :216-227
[16]   Filtration Recovery of Extracellular DNA from Environmental Water Samples [J].
Liang, Zhanbei ;
Keeley, Ann .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (16) :9324-9331
[17]  
Longmire Jonathan L., 1997, Occasional Papers the Museum Texas Tech University, V163, P1
[18]   Use of eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA to differentiate human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources in fecally contaminated surface water [J].
Martellini, A ;
Payment, P ;
Villemur, R .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (04) :541-548
[19]   Assessment of Environmental DNA for Detecting Presence of Imperiled Aquatic Amphibian Species in Isolated Wetlands [J].
McKee, Anna M. ;
Calhoun, Daniel L. ;
Barichivich, William J. ;
Spear, Stephen F. ;
Goldberg, Caren S. ;
Glenn, Travis C. .
JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 6 (02) :498-510
[20]   Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction [J].
Minamoto, Toshifumi ;
Naka, Takafumi ;
Moji, Kazuhiko ;
Maruyama, Atsushi .
LIMNOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) :23-32