Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in planktonic form and biofilms: A biocidal efficacy study of nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma

被引:126
作者
Joshi, Suresh G. [1 ,2 ]
Paff, Michelle [1 ]
Friedman, Gary [2 ]
Fridman, Greg [2 ,3 ]
Fridman, Alexander [2 ]
Brooks, Ari D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Surg Infect Program, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Div Plasma Biol & Med, AJ Drexel Plasma Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Sch Biomed Engn Sci & Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
关键词
Dielectric-Barrier Discharge plasma; dielectric barrier discharge; nonthermal plasma; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin-resistant S aureus; MRSA; infection control; STERILIZATION; DISINFECTION; SURFACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Bacterial contamination of surfaces with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious problem in the hospital environment and is responsible for significant nosocomial infections. The pathogenic contaminants form biofilms, which are difficult to treat with routine biocides. Thus, a continuous search for novel disinfection methods is essential for effective infection control measures. This demonstration of a novel technique for the control of virulent pathogens in planktonic form as well as in established biofilms may provide a progressive alternative to standard methodology. Methods: We evaluated a novel technique of normal atmospheric nonthermal plasma known as floating-electrode dielectric-barrier discharge (FE-DBD) plasma against a control of planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli, S aureus, multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA)-95 (clinical isolate), -USA300, and -USA400, using widely accepted techniques such as colony count assay, LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability assay, and XTT (2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5- carboxanilide) assay. Results: Exposure of free living planktonic forms of E coli, S aureus, and MRSA were rapidly inactivated by DBD plasma. Approximately 10(7) bacterial cells were completely (100%) killed, whereas 10(8) and 10(9) were reduced by approximately 90% to 95% and 40% to 45%, respectively, in less than 60 seconds (7.8 J/cm(2)) and completely disinfected in <= 120 seconds. In established biofilms, the susceptibility of MRSA USA400 was comparable with USA300 but less susceptible than MRSA95 (clinical isolate), S aureus, and E coli (P<.05) to FE-DBD plasma, and plasma was able to kill MRSA more than 60% within 15 seconds (1.95 J/cm(2)). The killing responses were plasma exposure-time dependent, and cell density dependent. The plasma was able disinfect surfaces in a less than 120 seconds. Conclusion: Application of DBD plasma can be a valuable decontamination technique for the removal of planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria such as MRSA-USA 300,-USA 400, methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA), and E coli, the more common hospital contaminants. Of interest, E coli was more resistant than S aureus phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] In vitro activity of tea-tree oil against clinical skin isolates of meticillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci growing planktonically and as biofilms
    Brady, Aaron
    Loughlin, Ryan
    Gilpin, Deirdre
    Kearney, Paddy
    Tunney, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 55 (10) : 1375 - 1380
  • [2] Use of atmospheric non-thermal plasma as a disinfectant for objects contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Burts, Monica L.
    Alexeff, Igor
    Meek, Eric T.
    McCullers, Jonathan A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2009, 37 (09) : 729 - 733
  • [3] DOUGLAS S, DIRECT MED COST HEAL
  • [4] A fluorescence assay to determine the viable biomass of microcosm dental plaque biofilms
    Filoche, Sara K.
    Coleman, Megan J.
    Angker, Linny
    Sissons, Chris H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 69 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [5] Fridman A., 2008, PLASMA CHEM, P848
  • [6] Blood coagulation and living tissue sterilization by floating-electrode dielectric barrier discharge in air
    Fridman, Gregory
    Peddinghaus, Marie
    Ayan, Halim
    Fridman, Alexander
    Balasubramanian, Manjula
    Gutsol, Alexander
    Brooks, Ari
    Friedman, Gary
    [J]. PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2006, 26 (04) : 425 - 442
  • [7] Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: Are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection?
    Hota, B
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (08) : 1182 - 1189
  • [8] JAMES T, 2008, P BIOM TAL TECHN SHO, P9
  • [9] Is gas-discharge plasma a new solution to the old problem of biofilm inactivation?
    Joaquin, Jonathan C.
    Kwan, Calvin
    Abramzon, Nina
    Vandervoort, Kurt
    Brelles-Marino, Graciela
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2009, 155 : 724 - 732
  • [10] Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005
    Klein, Eili
    Smith, David L.
    Laxminarayan, Ramanan
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 13 (12) : 1840 - 1846